Tag: bankrupt

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TENANTS IN COMMON VS JOINT TENANCY IN ONTARIO: THE MODERN RULES OF A 1 CO-OWNER UNHAPPY BANKRUPTCY

tenants in common vs joint tenancy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario: Shared ownership of property

There are two different types of property joint ownership: tenants in common vs joint tenancy. Whether you’re married or not, you still face the same problems. Having a co-owned home raises the issue of how the title should be held; tenants in common vs joint tenancy. Both are equally good. The answer really depends on the relationship between the co-owners and their estate planning needs.

A bankruptcy filing by one of the co-owners complicates matters further. A recent bankruptcy case decision in Ontario where only one of the joint owners filed for bankruptcy, highlights the problem, especially for non-bankrupt co-owner. This Brandon Blog discusses the recent bankruptcy case and what it means for both the bankrupt co-owner and the non-bankrupt co-owner regardless of the ownership choices between tenants in common vs joint tenancy.

Home ownership in Ontario: tenants in common vs joint tenants as co-owners

The word “tenants” is normally thought of with property rental. But both joint tenancy and tenants in common reference to a type of shared property ownership. As tenants in common, the ownership rights and all areas of an entire property are owned equally by all members of the group.

When one of the joint tenants dies, the deceased owner‘s share of the property passes to the surviving owner without going through the probate process. With tenants in common, in the event of death, this is not the case.. For asset protection and estate planning purposes, many married couples who want to hold title to the real property in a co-ownership structure, do so as joint tenants to avoid the probate process. Each joint tenant owns a 50% share ownership stake in the property.

Tenants in common may freely decide what ownership percentage of the property each owns. Each tenant in common does not need to own an equal percentage of the property; unequal ownership is fine as long as all co-owners agree on the ownership arrangements of unequal shares. The tenants in common can also transfer their share of the property through a Will, a real estate transfer, or even an arm’s length sale. Tenants in common are well advised to have a signed co-ownership agreement that spells everything out.

This is the primary difference between tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario for the joint ownership of real property.

tenants in common vs joint tenancy
tenants in common vs joint tenancy

Property ownership part 2: tenants in common vs joint tenants in Ontario and the bankruptcy of 1 co-owner

When a co-owner becomes bankrupt, what happens? The Brandon Blog faithful knows that I have previously explained that upon bankruptcy of a person, the non-exempt assets of the bankrupt should be vested in the licensed insolvency trustee, subject to secured creditors‘ rights. For real estate ownership, the answer does not change whether title is held in tenants in common vs joint tenancy.

There is an exemption in Ontario for equity in one’s home of not more than $10,783. It is not an exemption for the first $10K, but rather if the total equity is below that amount. Therefore, we can consider the equity in a bankrupt person’s ownership interest in their home to belong to the Trustee for all practical purposes.

If the bankrupt has a 50% ownership stake due to a joint tenancy agreement, then it is the bankrupt’s equity in half the home. If the bankrupt’s ownership stake is under a tenants in common co-ownership agreement, then it is the equity in only the bankrupt’s co-ownership share. In either scenario, the ownership interest of the non-bankrupt owners are not directly affected. However, the other co-owners’ are affected one way or the other by the bankruptcy of a co-owner. The legal case I am about to tell you about is no exception.

Land Owner Transparency Registry: A Public Database

Upon the person’s bankruptcy, the bankrupt must disclose all assets to the Trustee. With computerization and the internet, it is easy for a Trustee to determine if the bankrupt has an ownership interest in the real estate where they reside. This is whether or not the bankrupt has disclosed such ownership interest.

The decision of the Honourable Justice Pattillo of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Bankruptcy and Insolvency dated July 28, 2021, in Re Johansen Bankruptcy, 2021 ONSC 5241 (CanLII) highlights the issues in the bankruptcy of a co-owner of real estate. In December 2016, Mr. Johansen filed a voluntary bankruptcy assignment. In his sworn statement of affairs, he listed no realizable assets and liabilities of $73,968 (unsecured) and $14,950 (secured). No mention is made of any ownership in real estate.

The Trustee learned of the bankrupt’s interest in the home he lived in with his mother in March 2017. In the period from April 2017 to October 2020, the Trustee wrote to the bankrupt and Mrs. Johansen as well as spoke to the bankrupt several times about his interest in the home and why it hadn’t been disclosed. The bankrupt did not provide any information other than denying interest in the property, and his mother did not respond.

A FedEx courier envelope containing a one-page statutory declaration purportedly signed by Mrs. Johansen on October 18, 2018, arrived at the Trustee on October 16, 2020. Her declaration stated, in part, that putting the 20% in the bankrupt’s name was intended to provide her son with an interest in her Estate over and above any other entitlements under her Will. According to her, the 20% was a gift to be realized only after her death.

In the Trustee’s view, the bankrupt and his mother are playing games with each other. The Trustee applied to the court for a declaration that the bankrupt held a 20% interest in the home at the time of bankruptcy, and that he could partition and sell it. Despite the Trustee having a lawyer, the bankrupt represented himself. It would have been better if he had gotten legal advice and been represented in court.

tenants in common vs joint tenancy
tenants in common vs joint tenancy

Tenants In Common vs Joint Tenancy: Can your 90-year-old mother be thrown out of her house?

The Judge determined that the bankrupt owned a 20% interest in the property based on the legal title, and hence, that 20% interest vested in the Trustee pursuant to s. 71 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Mrs. Johansen’s statutory declaration to the effect that the bankrupt did not own the real estate and that the 20% was a gift that only passes to him on her death was not accepted by the Judge. The declaration was signed some two years after the bankruptcy when the Trustee’s ownership interest was well known. Despite repeated requests from the Trustee for information, it was not produced for another two years. In addition to what was noted by the Judge, his main concern was the way she characterized the bankrupt’s interest, given the evidence concerning the property they owned before this home, which Mrs. Johansen failed to mention.

Mrs. Johansen and the former marriage of the bankrupt’s wife, as well as the bankrupt, were the three parties on title to the home they purchased on January 30, 2007. They obtained a mortgage from TD Bank on January 30, 2007, which was discharged on February 21, 2007. Due to a marital split, the bankrupt’s wife was removed from the legal title on October 17, 2008, leaving just his mother Mrs. Johansen and himself as parties on the legal title. The bankrupt admitted that his ex-wife was paid for her interest in that home. On June 28, 2012, the bankrupt and his mother sold that home for $567,000, and the same day purchased the current home for $450,000.

The home was purchased in 2012. The title documents recorded at the time, its ownership is divided between 20% owned by the bankrupt and 80% owned by Mrs. Johansen. Mrs. Johansen and the bankrupt both signed the Land Transfer Tax affidavit showing as between tenants in common vs joint tenancy they chose to own the home as tenants in common. There are no mortgages recorded on the title.

All title searches, including a current title search, did not reveal the nature of the interests of each of Mrs. Johansen, the bankrupt or his ex-wife held in that previous home. However, it did show that each of them had an interest in it. The Judge determined that when Mrs. Johansen and the bankrupt bought the current home, it is a reasonable conclusion that the bankrupt had a 20% ownership interest in it. It was not intended to only pass on Mrs. Johansen’s death.

Justice Pattillo did not accept the bankrupt’s evidence that he has no interest in the property and had no knowledge that he was one of the parties on title. Given the history and the fact that he signed the affidavit of Land Transfer Tax at the time of purchase, Justice Pattillo held that the bankrupt was aware he had an interest in the legal title in the property.

Justice Pattillo found that the Trustee had the standing to bring the application for partition or sale of the property since he is a person with an interest in it. The Judge noted that Mrs. Johansen is 90 years old and does not wish to sell her home. Based on the evidence, however, he did not consider that to be of sufficient hardship to warrant refusing the requested remedy.

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy: The bankruptcy of 1 co-owner will affect the others

The Judge stayed his order for three months. He encouraged the bankrupt and through him his mother to seek professional advice so that this issue can be resolved with the Trustee before the sale process begins. The order will take effect if a resolution is not reached within that timeframe.

Now that the prospect of the sale of the entire home, not just the bankrupt’s co-ownership interest, was a reality, the bankrupt and his mother needed professional guidance. Their professional advice would be that the Trustee is only entitled to 20% of the bankrupt’s equity interest. So, if the mother from her own funds, or by getting a mortgage, can come up with the value of the 20% interest and pay it to the Trustee, then the house will not get sold. She will have bought the bankrupt son’s 20% interest, and the Trustee will have all the money he is entitled to.

If one co-owner goes bankrupt, the other co-owners are affected as well. It is the Trustee’s responsibility to convert the bankrupt’s equity into cash. One or more of the remaining co-owners are the natural buyers of the bankrupt co-owner’s interest. Sometimes non-bankrupt co-owners must sell, as is the case for Johansen if the mother cannot purchase the son’s equity from the Trustee, but most often someone will purchase the Trustee’s equity to maintain the status quo.

Had the choice of ownership interest as between tenants in common vs joint tenancy, this would not have changed the outcome of this case.

tenants in common vs joint tenancy
tenants in common vs joint tenancy

A lawyer can help you understand tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario

I hope that you found the tenants in common vs joint tenancy Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you or your company are in financial distress, cash-starved and cannot repay debts. There are several insolvency processes available to a company or a person with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

tenants in common vs joint tenancy
tenants in common vs joint tenancy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS A RECEIVERSHIP? OUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO RECEIVERSHIP SOLUTIONS

what is a receivership?

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

What is a receivership?

What is a receivership is a question I am asked often. Receivership is a remedy available to secured lenders to recoup as much of their debt as possible. A secured creditor, normally a financial institution, has lent funds to the company or individual under a secured financing transaction. They did it this way so in the event the company or person defaults on its finance payments, they can enforce against the assets subject to the security.

Receivership is a different process than bankruptcy for the sale of the properties of a corporation. In Canada, the secured creditor is typically the Bank as the lender. Normally, when a borrower misses payments, they tend to be insolvent. However, it is possible to have a receivership in Ontario even if the borrower is not insolvent.

In this Brandon Blog, I am going to tell you all about receivership. What is a receivership? How it works. When it can be used? What types of receivership are there?

What is a receivership? Examples of receivership in a sentence

What is a receivership? Receivership is a legal proceeding. Either a secured creditor privately appoints the receiver by instrument or a court appoints a person or company, called a receiver, to collect and manage the assets of a person or business that is unable to manage those assets effectively.

To understand more about the receivership process, we first need to look at the types of receivership. These are:

  • Liquidating receivership – This is a type of receivership that is brought about when a company ceases operations because the management of the company is unable to make it a viable business again. If the business is not viable, then the receiver will not operate it and will find buyers for the assets.
  • Operating receivership – This form of receivership is when parts of the company are viable or must otherwise continue operating under receivership. The business assets have a great deal of value if operating, but if shut down, relatively no value. In this case, the receiver will continue operating the business and the secured creditor will agree to lend funds if the business’s cash flow is insufficient. While operating the business, the receiver will also look for buyers.

The word “receiver” originally meant “a person appointed by a court to manage the affairs of another, especially a bankrupt or insolvent“. The term is now more widely applied and refers to a person placed in temporary charge and control of another person’s assets or a business entity. A receivership is a form of governance used in a wide range of situations. It is particularly common in the fields of law and business.

What is a receivership in a sentence – A receivership is a legal process started by a secured creditor either privately appointing a receiver by instrument or making an application to the court for an order that forces a party to carry out the duties of a receiver over the assets of a company or person.

what is a receivership
what is a receivership?

In Canada, section 243(4) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) dictates that only a licensed insolvency trustee can act as a receiver. From the above, you should now realize that there are two types of receivers: (i) privately appointed receiver; and (ii) court-appointed receiver.

What is a receivership? 10 – Day Notice of Intention to Enforce Security

Section 244 of the BIA relates to a secured creditor who intends to enforce its security against an insolvent debtor, either through private appointment or by making an application to the court. This section states that any secured creditor who intends to enforce against all, or substantially all, of the inventory, accounts receivable or other property used by the insolvent debtor in its business, must give adequate notice. The notice must be in writing by using the form prescribed by the BIA.

The BIA defines adequate as a minimum of 10 days. A secured creditor must send out the 10-day notice of intention to enforce security and cannot enforce its security until the 10 days have expired unless the debtor consents in writing to earlier enforcement. The purpose of giving the 10-day notice is to allow the insolvent debtor a chance to either negotiate some resolution with the secured creditor or otherwise attempt to reorganize its financial affairs. An example of reorganizing would be speaking with new potential lenders, consideration of assets that could be sold to repay or otherwise reduce the indebtedness to the unhappy secured creditor.

The insolvent debtor may also be considering invoking an insolvency process such as a Division I Proposal under the BIA to reorganize all of its debts to implement a financial reorganization strategy. If a proposal or a notice of intention to make a proposal under the BIA is filed by the insolvent debtor before the expiry of the 10 day period, then the enforcement action of the secured creditor has initially stayed.

That secured creditor would have to make an application to the court to show that it has lost total confidence in the insolvent debtor’s abilities and it will not support any reorganization attempt. The application is to lift the automatic stay of proceedings that happened when the insolvent debtor filed, to allow the secured creditor to enforce its security against the assets to try to recover as much of the secured debt as possible through the appointment of a receiver.

Why did 10 days become the official notice period? This was part of amendments to the BIA made in 2009. It arose as a .esult of court decisions over what is reasonable notice. The most famous case is one that insolvency practitioners refer to as Lister v. Dunlop. The case made its way all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada. The proper name of the case is R.E. Lister Ltd. v. Dunlop Canada Ltd., [1982] 1 S.C.R. 726. The decision was released on May 31, 1982.

The case dealt with a variety of issues, including what is receivership. Another of the issues considered was a reasonable notice to be given when a secured creditor demanded repayment of its demand loan, due to one or more defaults on loan? The most common default is defaulting on making the required loan payments on time. The loan agreement and debenture securing the loan stated that it was a demand loan and that the lender must give reasonable notice when making the demand.

However, in the “old days”, there was never a definition of what reasonable notice was. In fact, in Ontario, the law at the time was that reasonable notice only came into being if the business owner asked for a time to repay the loan. What was reasonable was a matter of discussion and negotiation. In Lister v. Dunlop, it was determined that Dunlop did not provide reasonable notice, based on the specific facts in that case.

Case law evolved and eventually, in 2009, the BIA was amended as part of the new provisions to bring receivership under the BIA and receivers subject to the supervision of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. The 10 day notice period was Parliament’s way to try to codify what reasonable notice is.

Court Appointed Receivers vs. Privately Appointed Receivers

As discussed above, receivers are appointed when secured creditors want to recover on their secured loans. Receivership is a remedy for secured creditors. It is not a remedy for unsecured creditors. The intent is for the receiver to take possession of the insolvent company assets subject to the security agreement and conduct a sale of assets. The proceeds of the sale will then be distributed in accordance with the priority of the creditors under the BIA. The secured creditor should want to make sure that it is in the first place to receive the funds from the receiver, for the receivership process they are paying for!

From the above, by now, you have probably realized that a privately appointed receiver is appointed in writing by the secured creditor. The receiver gets properly retained and then is given an appointment letter by the secured creditor after the 10 day notice period has either passed or was waived by the insolvent debtor. The privately appointed receiver gets its powers from the security documents which will outline the approved steps the receiver can take.

Court-appointed receivers, as the term implies, are appointed by the court. The secured creditor properly retains the receiver and makes an application to the court for the appointment of the receiver. The secured creditor is the plaintiff in this litigation. If the court grants the order, then the court-appointed receiver begins the receivership administration. The powers and responsibilities of the court-appointed receiver come from the court order, called the Appointment Order.

The steps the receiver will take in determining what method will realize the most money possible from the sale of assets should be pretty well identical under both a court-appointed receivership and a privately appointed receivership. The analysis of how and the steps to be taken to realize the most money possible from the assets of the company in receivership should be the same, regardless of the form of appointment.

Either way, as stated above, the receiver must be a licensed insolvency trustee who is experienced in acting as a licensed insolvency practitioner.

what is a receivership
what is a receivership

What is a receivership? Duties of a receiver

Receivers are required to act honestly and in good faith. A privately appointed receiver has a duty to the secured creditor who appointed the receiver. A court-appointed receiver has a duty to act in good faith to all creditors.

The main roles of the receiver, whether private or court-appointed, can be summarized as to:

  • Secure all the assets of the insolvent debtor pledged under the security agreement or covered by the Appointment Order.
  • Make sure the receiver has control of property, the assets are conserved and properly insured.
  • Advance the rights of the debtor with the approval of either the secured creditor or the court. This could include continuing or beginning any necessary litigation.
  • Formulate the plan to maximize the realization from the sale of assets. This also involves a decision as to whether or not to operate the business of the company.
  • Offer the assets for sale in a properly advertised public sale.
  • Complete the sale and distribute the net proceeds in accordance with the provisions of the BIA.
  • Make regular reporting to the court and/or the appointing creditor
  • Obtain the approval of the secured creditor, and under a court appointment, approval of the court for all actions to be taken by the receiver.
  • In a court appointment, to obtain the approval of the court for its fee and disbursements and for those of the receiver’s legal counsel.

The Appointment Order generally will give the court-appointed receiver extensive powers.

I want to summarize the difference between company receivership and bankruptcy

I find that many times people will confuse the terms receivership and bankruptcy. What is a receivership is not the same as what is bankruptcy. I want to summarize the difference between company receivership and bankruptcy. There are important differences between bankruptcy and receivership.

The terms bankruptcy and receivership are often mistakenly used; they are not the very same thing. Bankruptcy is a legal process for unsecured creditors. The bankruptcy of a person and that person’s discharge from bankruptcy acts to discharge that person’s unsecured debt. As a company is never discharged from bankruptcy, the bankruptcy process has the effect of ending the company’s business.

What is a receivership? Receivership on the other hand, is a legal process for the benefit of secured creditors that safeguards their security if an insolvent borrower defaults on its secured debt financial obligations.

what is a receivership
what is a receivership?

What is a receivership? Is receivership the right solution for you?

I hope you enjoyed the what is a receivership Brandon Blog post. I have gone to great lengths to describe what is a receivership, the different types of receivership and that it is a remedy for secured creditors. However, many times, if properly handled, it can also assist the business owner. The entrepreneur may be very frustrated that the company can no longer pay all its debts as they come due and is looking for a way out, a way to sell the business or a way to get rid of the sick parts of the business and keep the good parts.

There may be sufficient value to take care of the secured creditor, but nothing for anyone else, including the unsecured creditors. There may be some business units that should not survive, but if cut out, the business will be viable. A receivership might very well accomplish the goals for the entrepreneur also. I have many times structured a receivership process, in order to meet the goals of the entrepreneur, while satisfying the requirements of the secured creditor.

Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what is a receivership
what is a receivership?
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

UNDISCHARGED BANKRUPT: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE

undischarged bankrupt
undischarged bankrupt

If you would prefer to hear an audio version of this undischarged bankrupt Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast

Undischarged bankrupt introduction

I recently read a Manitoba court decision issued in late October about the position taken by a judgment creditor in an undischarged bankrupt’s hearing. The creditor holding the judgment realized that the bankrupt’s discharge would discharge that debt. So, they tried to convince the court that their debt fit into one of the limited classes of debt that is not discharged by the bankrupt discharge.

That court case reminded me that is not so unusual. Many times a creditor who holds a judgment against the undischarged bankrupt tries to bootstrap their position. One of the leading cases cited by the Manitoba court is a 2018 decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to describe the bankruptcy discharge process, the position taken by the judgment creditor and what the Court has to say about that.

How bankruptcies work in Canada

The Canadian bankruptcy legislation is open for an insolvent and not viable company, or the insolvent, honest but unfortunate person can obtain relief. Subject to trust claimants’ rights and secured creditors, the company or person is assigning all of their unencumbered assets to the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee). In return, the bankrupt person can have all of their debts discharged, subject to certain exceptions.

The bankruptcy discharge is amongst the primary advantages of relief under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The discharge is vital to the bankruptcy procedure. Debtors, after bankruptcy, can wipe the slate tidy as well as begin over. This is a central concept under the BIA law. That is the essence of the bankruptcy discharge meaning.

A bankruptcy discharge is when the bankrupt is released under Canadian bankruptcy law from his or her financial debts as part of the bankruptcy discharge procedure. Some people think that it is the declaring for bankruptcy that releases the insolvent from obligation. This is not the case, it is the discharge that releases a bankrupt from debt.

A bankruptcy discharge provides the discharge of all unsecured debts, except for:

  • support payments to a previous partner or children;
  • penalties or fines enforced by the Court;
  • financial debts arising from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
  • student loans if less than seven years have actually passed since the bankrupt stopped being a part-time or full-time student.

Can an undischarged bankrupt leave the country?

If you are an undischarged bankrupt, you can travel. There are no restrictions on you leaving or returning to Canada if you are travelling for work or on vacation. Just make sure that your travel plans do not interfere with your legal obligation and your duties in your personal bankruptcy case, including:

  • attending a meeting of creditors (if one is required);
  • showing up for your mandatory counselling sessions;
  • submitting your monthly income reports to the Trustee;
  • remitting any surplus income payments you are required to make;
  • providing your financial information to the Trustee so that your pre and post-bankruptcy income tax returns can be filed;
  • being able to respond to any inquiries from your Trustee; and
  • attending in Court for your bankruptcy discharge hearing in an opposed discharge application.

    undischarged bankrupt
    undischarged bankrupt

Undischarged bankrupt: What is an undischarged debt?

When a bankrupt is discharged from bankruptcy, the individual is released from the legal obligation to repay their different types of debt that is unsecured and existed on the day that the bankruptcy was filed, except for the following types of original debt:

  • Alimony or support payments to a previous spouse or for the children;
  • Fines or monetary penalties imposed by the Court;
  • Financial obligations arising from fraud, misappropriation or defalcation; or
  • Student loans if less than seven years have actually passed since the person stopped being a full or part-time student.

So other than for the small category of debts that are not discharged, once the bankrupt is discharged from their bankruptcy, they do not have to make payments on debts that existed at the date of bankruptcy.

Undischarged bankrupt: Trustee opposed the discharge

A first-time bankrupt, who does not need to pay surplus income, is entitled to an automatic discharge after 9 months. This assumes that they have lived up to all of their obligations as an undischarged bankrupt and fully cooperated with the LIT. If this first-time bankrupt is subject to surplus income, then they must pay it for 21 months before they are entitled to a discharge. Longer timelines apply for a second or more time bankrupt.

If the Trustee has evidence that the bankrupt has not been forthright and fully cooperative, or has actually committed one or more bankruptcy offences, then the Trustee has a duty to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge.

Notice of opposition to discharge

Similarly, any unsecured creditor can oppose the bankrupt’s discharge. The grounds of opposition would likewise be evidence of lack of honesty or that one or more offences have been committed. The process for a creditor opposing the discharge of the bankrupt is by filing a notice of opposition to discharge.

In either a Trustee or creditor opposed discharge, the bankrupt’s application for discharge must be heard in Bankruptcy Court. For more on the discharge process, you can read about it in one of my previous Brandon’s Blogs.

undischarged bankrupt
undischarged bankrupt

The judgement creditor

Often, a judgment creditor thinks they have a higher position in the pecking order than other unsecured creditors because they have a judgment. They may have even registered the judgement against the title to real estate owned wholly or partially by the defendant. Unfortunately, upon the bankruptcy of a person, all enforcement proceedings on a judgment must stop.

The judgment for a debt, in bankruptcy, is merely a piece of paper that proves you have unsecured debt. Nothing else. Anyone who understands the litigation process knows that there is a big difference between getting a judgment and collecting on it.

Judgement creditors may take a keener interest in the bankruptcy proceedings, including opposing the discharge from bankruptcy. The reasons for this are twofold:

  • The judgment creditor has already spent time in court, money on legal fees and still has not collected their debt, so they are more invested in this person’s bankruptcy than someone who did not go the court route.
  • They are hoping that they can somehow fit their money judgment only into a position where they can claim that the debt is one not released by an order of discharge.

It is this second reason that this Manitoba court case, and the Court of Appeal for Ontario decision relied upon by the Manitoba court, revolves around.

Undischarged bankrupt: Can more evidence be introduced by a judgment creditor at the discharge hearing?

Most judgements that I see in a debt settlement program under the BIA or bankruptcy tend to fall into the same category. A service or good was supplied and not paid for. A contract was entered into and was breached. That is just normal business. There is no fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, defalcation, fraudulent misrepresentation or fraudulent breach of trust.

It is simply someone owes money and didn’t pay. The plaintiff entered all of the evidence they thought was important, the defendant either defended or allowed for default judgment to be obtained because they did not defend. Regardless, the court ordered the defendant to pay the money.

The judgement creditor was unpaid and then one day received the Trustee’s notice of bankruptcy in the mail. The judgment creditor was incensed. The creditor took an active interest in the bankruptcy proceedings and maybe even served as a bankruptcy inspector. The bankrupt person is now entitled to apply for his or her discharge from bankruptcy.

The judgment creditor is unhappy because they now know that they are receiving either nothing or a small dividend from the Trustee compared to the debt to be written off. So they now oppose the bankrupt’s discharge and try to get new evidence submitted to the Bankruptcy Court to somehow prove that their judgment is a claim that is not extinguished by the person’s bankruptcy discharge.

This is what the Court of Appeal decision was all about. Can you introduce new evidence at a bankruptcy discharge hearing?

The case I am referring to, Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company v. Rodriguez, 2018 ONCA 171 (CanLII). The appeals court said that the answer is no. You can read the entire decision here if you like. The Court of Appeal essentially said that the Court is allowed to look at:

  • the judgment
  • the proof that would certainly have been entered as evidence at the time in the pleadings
  • as well as that evidence which has been led in the bankruptcy discharge hearing

to analyze whether the judgment debt falls within an exclusion to the general discharge rules. The Court also said that in a bankruptcy discharge hearing, the application judge was limited to looking at the judgment, the pleadings, the statement of claim and any statement of defence, to determine whether the judgment fell into the class of those debts not released by a discharge from bankruptcy. New evidence is not allowed.

This finding has been followed and further clarified. It is now apparent that the only purpose of a bankrupt’s application for discharge is to consider the bankrupt’s application. It is not a forum to attempt to advance new or amended claims.

undischarged bankrupt
undischarged bankrupt

Undischarged bankrupt summary

I hope you enjoyed this Brandon’s Blog on the undischarged bankrupt. Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt. You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We know that we can help you the way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

undischarged bankrupt

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL STORY 4 – TRUE STORIES

Introduction

This consumer proposal story 4 Brandon’s Blog is about how four of our clients were able to enter into a government approved debt settlement program, shed their debt and restart their lives.

As I have written in previous blogs, a consumer proposal is the only government approved debt settlement plan. It is designed for people who have $250,000 or less in total debt, other than for any debts secured against their home such as a mortgage or secured home equity line of credit.

If the consumer proposal receives the (deemed) acceptance by the required majority of creditors and it also receives (deemed) court approval, then the consumer proposal is approved. The insolvent person must now make the payments to the licensed insolvency trustee who is the consumer proposal administrator.

The following four real client consumer proposal story situations of mine I believe are representative of the kind of person we help end the pain and anxiety their debts are causing them. I have changed the names of the people for this Brandon’s Blog.

Buzz

This client is a 56-year-old married male. I will call him Buzz. He has annual income, net of income tax of $100,000. He has assets with a net realizable value of $1,000. His consumer debt totalled $71,000.

In reviewing his budget and affairs, we calculated that in personal bankruptcy, he would be required to contribute surplus income for 36 months as he was previously bankrupt. His surplus income obligation in bankruptcy was just over $34,000 in equal monthly instalments of $944.44.

We advised him that since his budget had room for him to make monthly payments, he should consider a consumer proposal. We drafted and filed his consumer proposal requiring him to pay $40,000 in total over 5 years. This resulted in equal monthly payments each of $667.

Buzz’s creditors accepted his consumer proposal and he is making the payments. This way he avoided bankruptcy and ended up with an approved debt settlement plan with monthly payments he can afford.

Woody

This client is a 65-year-old single male. I will call him Woody. He has annual income, net of income tax of $27,600. He has assets with a net realizable value of $500. His consumer debt totalled $108,000.

In reviewing his budget and affairs, we calculated that in personal bankruptcy, he would be required to contribute surplus income for 9 months as he was never previously bankrupt. His surplus income obligation in bankruptcy was just over $1,880 in equal monthly instalments of $208.89.

We advised him that since his budget had room for him to make monthly payments, he should consider a consumer proposal. We drafted and filed his consumer proposal requiring him to pay $24,000 in total over 5 years. This resulted in equal monthly payments each of $400.

Woody’s creditors accepted his consumer proposal and he is making his payments. This way he avoided bankruptcy and ended up with an approved debt settlement plan with monthly payments he can afford.

Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head

Our 3rd client is a 47-year-old married man and his 43-year-old wife. I will call them Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head. Their yearly income, net of tax obligations was $51,996. Their assets had a realizable value of $953. They are collectively responsible for the exact same consumer financial debts amounting to $31,820.

In assessing their budget, we computed that in a bankruptcy, they would need to pay surplus income for 9 months as neither were bankrupt before. Their surplus income responsibility in a joint bankruptcy was $5,271 in regular monthly instalments of $585.67.

We encouraged them that given their budget plan had room to make month-to-month payments, they must take into consideration the possibility of making a consumer proposal. We prepared and filed their consumer proposal needing them to pay $7,020 over 3 years. This led to regular monthly payments each of $195.

Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head’s creditors approved the consumer proposal and they are making their payments. In this manner, they will not go bankrupt and wound up with an accepted debt negotiation strategy with month-to-month payments they can manage.

Jessie

This client is a 67-year-old married female. I will call her Jessie. She has annual income, net of income tax of $58,416. She has assets with a net realizable value of $250. Her consumer debt totalled $67,000.

In examining her budget plan, we determined that in bankruptcy, she would be called for surplus income payments for 36 months as she was once a bankrupt. Her surplus income commitment in a bankruptcy would be $17,465 in regular monthly instalments of $485.13.

Considering that her spending plan had space to make month-to-month repayments, we encouraged her to seriously think about making a consumer proposal. We composed and submitted her consumer proposal needing her to pay $21,500 over a 40 month period. This would be regular monthly payments each of $537.50.

Jessie’s creditors approved her consumer proposal and she is making her repayments. By doing this she stayed clear of bankruptcy and wound up with an approved debt negotiation strategy with regular monthly repayments she can manage.

Consumer proposal story summary

I hope these real-life consumer proposal story 4 examples gives you a better idea of the kind of people this debt settlement program strategy is meant to help. It is a way for people to shed their debt and get back on a proper footing.

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal story

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

OSAP BANKRUPTCY IS NOT AS SIMPLE AS YOU MIGHT THINK

OSAP bankruptcy Introduction

I have written before on the issue of the difficulty in discharging student loans through bankruptcy. Bankruptcy will certainly not release your student loans debt until you’ve been out of full or part-time studies for 7 years. It is also question and answer #8 in our TOP 20 PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY FAQS found on our main website. In Brandon’s Blog, I want to drill down into the issue of an OSAP bankruptcy.

What is OSAP?

The Ontario Student Assistance Program (OSAP) is a financial assistance program that can assist students in spending for college or university.

OSAP provides money via:

  • Grant: cash you do not need to repay
  • Loan: a loan you are required to pay off when you’re done college or university

OSAP can assist your spending for:

  • tuition
  • books and supplies/equipment
  • student fees billed by an institution
  • living expenditures
  • childcare

Amongst the various categories of people who are not eligible for OSAP, one is those people who have filed for either personal bankruptcy or a consumer proposal. As you might imagine, the rules surrounding OSAP bankruptcy are not simple. Let’s do some drilling down now!

Students that did not get student loans before the day they declared bankruptcy or filed a consumer proposal

If the student has been discharged from bankruptcy or fully completed a consumer proposal, she or he does not require to offer any type of supporting paperwork in order for their OSAP application to be reviewed.

If the student is an undischarged bankrupt or has not completed the consumer proposal, the student must supply a letter from their licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) or consumer proposal administrator. The document must show the day the student filed for either bankruptcy or the consumer proposal and that these 2 matters have actually been or will be satisfied:

  • Ontario and Canada is not a creditor in the bankruptcy or consumer proposal as an outcome of monetary help provided via OSAP; and
  • no monetary help offered to the student via OSAP during the current OSAP year will be taken in the insolvency proceedings to pay back the creditors

Discharged and the student is not presently enrolled in studies

If the student is discharged from bankruptcy or has successfully completed a consumer proposal, his/her OSAP application will not be decided upon until the student gives evidence that they have no amount owing on any student loans.

Alternatively, if applicable, the student can show that he/she received relief in their bankruptcy by way of a court order stating that section 178(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) no longer applies to the student loans.

In this situation, the student needs to supply:

  • evidence that an order of discharge or full completion of the consumer proposal has been achieved and that 3 years have expired since that date
  • a copy of the notice of bankruptcy/consumer proposal
  • letter from the student’s bank and/or the National Student Loans Service Centre confirming there is no outstanding balance
  • any relevant court order

Discharged and continuing a program of study

If the student is discharged from bankruptcy or has successfully completed a consumer proposal, his/her OSAP application will not be decided upon until the student gives evidence that they have no amount owing on any student loans.

Alternatively, if applicable, the student can show that he/she received relief in their bankruptcy by way of a court order stating that section 178(1)(g) of the BIA no longer applies to the student loans.

In this situation, the student needs to prove that he/she meets all of the following criteria:

  • at the time the student declared bankruptcy or filed the consumer proposal, they were enrolled in an accepted program of study at an accepted school and taking the minimum called for course load
  • the student remains in the same accepted program they were in on the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date
  • the student has not had a break in studies longer than 6 months since the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date
  • it has not been greater than 3 fiscal years since the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date

In this situation, the student needs to supply:

  • evidence that an order of discharge or full completion of the consumer proposal has been achieved and that 3 years have expired since that date
  • a copy of the notice of bankruptcy/consumer proposal
  • letter from the student’s bank and/or the National Student Loans Service Centre confirming there is no outstanding balance
  • any relevant court order
  • letter from the student’s Financial Aid Office verifying that the program of study in which the student was registered at the time of the bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing, is the same as the program the student is now applying for

Undischarged bankrupt or has not yet fully completed the consumer proposal

If the student is an undischarged bankrupt or has not successfully completed a consumer proposal, the processing of the student’s OSAP application will not be completed until the student gives evidence that they have no amount owing on any student loans.

In this situation, the student needs to prove that he/she meets all of the following criteria:

  • at the time the student declared bankruptcy or filed the consumer proposal, they were enrolled in an accepted program of study at an accepted school and taking the minimum called for course load
  • the student remains in the same accepted program the were in on the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date
  • the student has not had a break in studies longer than 6 months since the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date
  • it has not been greater than 3 fiscal years since the date of bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing date

In this situation, the student needs to supply a letter from their licensed insolvency trustee or consumer proposal administrator. The document must show the day the student filed for either bankruptcy or the consumer proposal and that these 2 matters have actually been or will be satisfied:

  • Ontario and Canada is not a creditor in the bankruptcy or consumer proposal as an outcome of monetary help provided via OSAP; and
  • no monetary help offered to the student via OSAP during the current OSAP year will be taken in the insolvency proceedings to pay back the creditors

The student will also need to supply a:

  • letter from the student’s bank and/or the National Student Loans Service Centre confirming there is no outstanding balance
  • any relevant court order
  • letter from the student’s Financial Aid Office verifying that the program of study in which the student was registered at the time of the bankruptcy/consumer proposal filing, is the same as the program the student is now applying for

Summary

I hope you now understand that the whole area of OSAP bankruptcy and student loans in either a bankruptcy or consumer proposal is not as simple as you might have originally thought. This is especially the case if the student is continuing his or her studies.

Do you have too much debt? Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

osap bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT RELIEF CANADA: CAN YOU DIPLOMATICALLY AVOID BANKRUPTCY?

2 1920x1080 3

Debt relief Canada: Introduction

This is always a hot topic. I am asked often how does debt relief Canada work? I recently wrote blogs about professional athletes who made a lot of money in their careers and who are now broke, or worse, bankrupt.

I am going to tell you about former tennis star Boris Becker. He is trying to avoid bankruptcy, diplomatically.

First some background information. The inviolability of diplomats is among the oldest rules of international law. During the Greek Empire, it was unlawful to abuse, apprehend or detain a country’s agent. In contemporary times, there is polite resistance from court territory as a matter of global regulation. The purpose of this is to make certain the reliable efficiency of diplomatic features preventing the holding authority from intervening with the diplomat’s job.

Debt relief Canada: Diplomatic immunity

Diplomatic immunity separates into 3 categories. The resistance of the consular office properties and residential properties. The buildings, cars, archives and diplomatic communications. While the holding authority has a task to shield the diplomatic properties from any type of damages, the embassy remains immune from any kind of law enforcement actions. The authorities cannot enter the consular office other than to safeguard human life for instance of a severe emergency.

The 2nd kind is within the premises. The resistance of the employees functioning in the consular office from the local court’s jurisdiction. Mediators are immune from any kind of type of law enforcement like arrest, search as well as apprehension.

The 3rd kind is that the diplomat, as well as his/her family members, are additionally immune in the hosting country from paying taxes other than the settlement for solutions like electricity or water.

Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations states that diplomatic immunity could only be forgoed by the sending out government.

Debt relief Canada: The Boris Becker story

It likely raised a few eyebrows when Boris Becker revealed he was pursuing a 2nd profession in diplomacy In April 2018 as the Central African Republic’s attaché for Sports/Humanitarian/Cultural Affairs in the European Union.

The statement came while Becker had a claim made against him over a loan he presumably owes to exclusive financial institution Arbuthnot Latham, after the sports celebrity’s bankruptcy in 2017. His lawyers claim that his diplomatic function grants him immunity under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. They state this indicates he cannot be subject to any kind of lawful procedure in the courts of any nation. Additionally, they say this protection is for as long as he stays an identified diplomatic representative.

The Boris Becker method of debt relief

His legal representatives have also provided those claims to Britain’s High Court, saying that British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson in addition to the Central African Republic would need to decide whether any kind of suits could continue. This takes the bankruptcy of a previous tennis star transforming it into a politically delicate matter. The Court process against Becker might lead various other countries can potentially make use of the situation. In the same fashion British diplomats abroad could lose immunity if certain countries wished to make a point.

Becker’s defence method has actually likewise set off inquiries over his motivations as well as timing in accepting a polite duty with the Central African Republic— a nation in the midst of a bloody civil conflict and humanitarian situation. It appears now the Republic has more important matters to focus on. Its social and sporting activities ties to Europe cannot be a current priority.

The former tennis champ condemned the choice to start bankruptcy procedures versus him as unjustified and unjust and introduced he would look for payment for the totally unneeded affirmation of bankruptcy that he was pushed into.

Debt relief Canada: The precedent story of Sheikh Walid Juffali

The Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations I previously referred to, has actually long been controversial. In 2014, the little Caribbean island of Saint Lucia named Saudi business owner Sheikh Walid Juffali its irreversible representative. Moreover, this appointment occurred after his former spouse Christina Estrada separated from him and instituted divorce proceedings.

Britain’s High Court ruled that his diplomatic status was totally fabricated. Britain’s Foreign Office slammed the judgment when stating it can result in problems with British diplomats’ immunity abroad. The Court said that Sheikh Walid Juffali, a permanent resident of Britain, is not protected by his diplomatic status. Estrada’s award was about $100 million.

Applying the very same reasoning in Becker’s instance would negate any diplomatic immunity claim by the long-time British homeowner.

What if you can’t claim diplomatic immunity?

Boris Becker’s uses a very novel and entertaining defence to avoid lawsuits to recover debts. However, most of us don’t have the ability to get diplomatic status from a country and then claim immunity. We deal with creditors suing us on our debts. We have to take a less dramatic and more common sense approach. Here is my list of options for those looking for debt help in Canada.

Debt relief Canada: Credit counselling

This addresses debt troubles without bankruptcy and supplies you with the skills to live debt totally free. Credit counselling solutions consist of budgeting, just how to use debt intelligently, restoring credit as well as debt management programs.

Debt management programs are developed to aid you to settle your debt. You enlist willingly in a debt monitoring program; the court did not mandate it. When you enlist a credit counsellor will call your financial institutions and ask for their collaboration in minimizing your debt. Your creditors could agree in ways like minimizing the amount of debt owing. A debt management program cannot cover all debts. It cannot cover secured debts. A mortgage, line of credit registered against your home or an auto loan are examples of debts not covered.

Debt relief Canada: Debt consolidation

Debt consolidation is getting a loan that enables you to settle your financial debts to a number of or all your unsecured creditors, leaving you with simply one loan. Usually, this approach is ideal to deal with your unsecured debts. The theory is that the debt consolidation loan will have a lower annual interest rate than many of your unsecured debts.

Debt relief Canada: Proposals

Consumer proposals and Division 1 proposals are alternatives to bankruptcy. Although similar in many areas, there are some major distinctions. Consumer proposals are readily available to people whose overall financial debts do not go beyond $250,000, not consisting of debts secured by your house. Division 1 proposals are for both companies as well as people whose financial obligations go beyond $250,000 (excluding the mortgage on their primary residence).

Proposals are governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Collaborating with a licensed insolvency trustee you make a proposal to:

✥ Pay your creditors a percentage of what you owe them over a certain
 amount of time, without any interest

✥ Extend the time you need to repay the debt

✥ Or a mix of both

Proposal payments are made to your trustee. The trustee uses that money to pay each of your creditors. You can take up to 5 years to complete a proposal.

The last resort: Bankruptcy

As a last resort, you can declare bankruptcy. The Government of Canada licences and supervises us. We can look at your circumstance and discuss with you the options available to you to avoid bankruptcy. We can also advise you what is involved in the bankruptcy option and administer it for you.

Do you have too much debt?

I can’t provide you diplomatic immunity from your debts. However, If you’re thinking about a consumer proposal or are looking for ways to end your financial debt, or you need CRA debt forgiveness, call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We understand the stress and pain your financial problems are causing you. We feel your pain and we can end it for you.

Our strategy for every single person is to develop a result where Starting Over, Starting Now comes true, starting the minute you walk through our door. You’re just one call away from taking the necessary actions to get back on the road to leading a healthy and stress-free life.

debt relief canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT HAPPENS TO DEBT WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: ARE YOU FREE OF DEBT

what happens to debt when you die canada
what happens to debt when you die canada

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this what happens to debt when you die Canada Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

What happens to debt when you die Canada introduction

When discussions of debt come up, people often joke around and say they’ll finally be free of debt when they die. But, is that true? Although we’ve written about this issue before, we thought this would be a good opportunity to update you. Does debt survive death? In Brandon’s blog, I want to explore with you what happens to debt when you die Canada.

In this what happens to debt when you die Canada blog, I use the terms Estate Trustee and Executor interchangeably. Here are some previous blogs I wrote on the topic of debt and death.

 

 

 

What are an Estate, Executors, and Beneficiaries?

When you pass away, all of the assets (your life belongings) and obligations (your financial debts) in your name enter into a separate legal entity called your estate. Your will certainly names one or more people or firms to act as your Estate Trustee to sort out the finances, administer the estate and ultimately, make the necessary distributions to the beneficiaries. There are no special requirements to be an Estate Trustee. It is really up to the wishes of the deceased.

The Estate Trustee or executor first needs to be a copy of the Death Certificate. That document is required for the executor to do what is necessary for administering the estate. The will expresses the desire of the deceased in dealing with his or her estate.

The Estate Trustee is in charge of securing, insuring and either selling or distributing your possessions. The Estate Trustee must also collect all relevant documents of the deceased that might indicate the extent of the assets and liabilities.

They are also liable for making sure that the debts of the deceased are also paid off before there is any distribution to the beneficiaries. The Estate Trustee must make sure that they understand what happens to debt when you die Canada. There are specific rules that an executor must follow. Each province establishes its own rules.

Beneficiaries are the parties named in the will of the deceased entitled to receive either specific assets or possessions and/or cash from their sale. An Estate Trustee can be a pal or relative that the deceased had full trust and confidence in who is willing and capable to do the task.

Choosing a close friend or relative to act makes sense because they are trusted. However, not everyone views such an appointment as an honour. Rather, it can be viewed as an obligation they do not feel comfortable carrying out. Anyone thinking of naming a close friend or relative should discuss it first with them to make sure they are willing to take on the role.

It can also be an independent professional or company that is experienced in acting as an Estate Trustee. We have been appointed as Estate Trustee when relatives or friends do not feel comfortable, choose the option to renounce their responsibility and a new executor must be appointed. As you can see, there are many steps that an Estate Trustee must take to properly administer the estate.

what happens to debt when you die canada
what happens to debt when you die canada

What happens to debt when you die Canada: When Debt Collectors Call

Taking care of the financial debts of the deceased person can be confusing. Along with the psychological stress and the countless jobs that require scrutiny, you now have the debt collectors calling trying to collect on the outstanding bills.

Debt collectors can commonly call the family of the departed to do their best to collect the outstanding debt. Guidelines vary between provinces. Collection agencies will use many deceptions to try to collect debts that only the deceased is responsible for. All such calls should be directed to the Estate Trustee who should request that all communications come only in writing.

If assets pass to you as a beneficiary, the only time a beneficiary, who has not co-signed or guaranteed any debts of the deceased would be responsible for any related debt, is if the debt is secured. For example, if the will calls for you to inherit the home or vehicle of the deceased, there could be a mortgage against the home or vehicle financing involved. Those debts are secured and follow the asset.

Unsecured debt is outstanding debt that is not specific to any asset. The Estate Trustee must make sure that all unsecured debts, including income tax debt, are fully paid off before any distribution is made to the beneficiaries.

What happens to debt when you die Canada if there is a secured debt against specific assets and the beneficiary of those assets cannot afford to maintain the loan payments? If proper estate planning was not done, such as using a life insurance policy to cover secured debts or large unsecured debt like income tax debt, then it is probably best that the Estate Trustee takes the option of selling the asset in question.

The cash obtained from the sale, after paying off the related secured debt, and any income tax liability arising from the sale of the asset, can then be paid to the beneficiary who was entitled to that asset. Obviously, the Estate Trustee will have to discuss this with the beneficiary before taking any action with an asset and get their agreement.

It is clear that the Estate Trustee role is not a simple one. Most often, legal advice is necessary to make sure that mistakes are not made.

What happens to debt when you die Canada: Who is responsible for the debts?

All of your assets that are registered solely in your name make up your estate. Examples of such assets are bank accounts, like savings and chequing accounts, cash, real estate, stocks, etc. Your estate will then go through a process called probate to decide its value.

Before your assets can be bequeathed as you’ve requested in your will, your estate uses them to pay off your financial obligations. An executor takes care of these things. Only after your bills are paid off will your heirs inherit anything.

If there aren’t enough assets in your estate to pay off your liabilities, any co-signer will be on the hook for the specific debts they co-signed on. If the estate is insolvent, then the Estate Trustee would be forced to make an application to the bankruptcy court for authority to assign the deceased’s insolvent estate into bankruptcy.

Yes, a dead person can become bankrupt, believe it or not. I have done several bankruptcies of deceased estates. That is what happens to debt when you die Canada if there are not enough assets that when liquidated, will pay off all of the debts of the deceased.

What assets are safe from creditors?

Typically retirement accounts and insurance policies, as long as they name a designated beneficiary, are safe from creditors. However, they are not safe if the deceased designated his or her estate as the beneficiary.

what happens to debt when you die canada
what happens to debt when you die canada

What happens to debt when you die Canada: There are different types of debt

Mortgages:

Mortgages are secured obligations, meaning that they’re among the first to claim your assets to get paid. If someone inherited the home or the home was owned jointly and each owner was registered as joint tenants, then they’re responsible for the mortgage. It can be considered not only as a secured loan but, in the case of joint tenants, a joint mortgage loan!

UPDATE: Check out our blog

WHAT HAPPENS TO MORTGAGE WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: DEBT PHILOSOPHY EXPLAINED.

Vehicle Loans:

Auto loans, like mortgages, are another example of secured loans, meaning that they’re among the first to claim your asset(s) that were pledged as security for the loan, to get paid. If the estate can’t pay off the amount owing and you have a co-signer or guarantor responsible for what is now a joint debt, they will be responsible for the car loan. If the loan isn’t repaid by the estate or the co-signer (if there is a joint debt holder), the car will likely be repossessed.

When the lender sells the vehicle, if the net proceeds (net of all recovery and enforcement costs) yields insufficient funds to pay off the loan, then the estate (and co-signer) are responsible for this shortfall.

Credit Card Debts:

Credit card debt, unlike a mortgage or a car loan, isn’t secured. This means that if the estate can’t pay back the amount owing on each credit card, the creditors are out of luck. However, if there is a joint credit card holder, who holds a supplementary credit card then they are responsible to pay back the debt.

Many people don’t know that merely holding a supplementary credit card makes that person a joint debt holder who is responsible to repay the balance owing in full. That is a term of a standard credit card agreement of the credit card issuer. Credit card insurance is available to take care of credit card debt, but it is costly. Normally the bank lines up an insurance company to provide that life insurance policy coverage.

UPDATE: Check out our blog

CREDIT CARD DEBT AFTER DEATH IN CANADA: WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

What happens to debt when you die Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this what happens to debt when you die Canada Brandon Blog. The Estate Trustee is the administrator charged with the responsibility of properly administering the estate of the deceased.

Don’t pass on your financial obligations to anyone else after your death; it’s important to deal with debt while you’re alive. Give us a call today. The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team can help you get rid of debt Starting Over, Starting Now.

We understand the pain you are in because of too much debt. We also know how to end your pain. Don’t pass that pain on to your loved ones. You don’t have to wonder what happens to debt when you die Canada.

Contact us today so we can begin healing you to lead a stress-free life.

Being debt-free will give you the peace of mind that all is in order and that you’re not burdening your heirs with financial hardship.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT FORGIVENESS CRA: CANADA REVENUE AGENCY BEATS DONOVAN BAILEY

debt forgiveness craDebt forgiveness CRA: Introduction

Last week we told you about professional athletes who earned enormous fortunes and blew it all on lavish, unsupportable lifestyles. The end result was bankruptcy. There is another group of professional athletes who also earned millions and ended up using a bankruptcy alternative to avoid bankruptcy, but not because they blew it all. They were trying to shield their money from taxes through complex offshore tax structures. However, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) reassessed them and now they had a huge tax bill and needed debt forgiveness CRA.

CRA debt forgiveness: Donovan Bailey tries to race Canada Revenue Agency

This is certainly not a new phenomenon. The newspapers and tabloids often feature stories about famous people who the tax department reassesses for using complex tax structures designed by agents, managers, accountants, and lawyers. In this case, our very own Olympian, Donovan Bailey, had to file a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), as a result of an offshore tax scheme to try to beat the CRA. And, sadly, he’s not the only one.

Debt forgiveness CRA: Her Majesty outruns the offshore tax scheme

The offshore tax scheme that nearly bankrupted Donovan Bailey was designed to lessen the amount of income tax to be paid. Donovan Bailey made a “charitable donation”. It went through a complicated series of transactions. The money made its way back to Mr. Bailey, through an offshore account. It was supposed to come back in tax-free.

The problem was that the tax authority reassessed Donovan Bailey. They said the charitable donation was no more than a sham to avoid paying taxes. Instead of tax-free money Donovan Bailey found himself in debt to the CRA to the tune of $2.3 million in unpaid taxes and ended up in bankruptcy court.

Debt forgiveness CRA: CRA gets tough

The CRA has vowed to get tough on tax evaders and the tax professionals who help them. CRA threatens with increased fines and jail sentences. They have a strategy to root out high-risk wealthy Canadians and corporations that stash cash in offshore accounts to avoid taxes. And, they’re spending $444 million on these measures, and expect to recoup $2.6 billion in added revenue over five years.

Debt forgiveness CRA: What to do if you have too much debt

No one likes to pay taxes, but trying to hide money from the CRA could land you fines, jail time and/or bankruptcy. If you’re considering bankruptcy because of income tax debt or for any reason, we can show you bankruptcy alternatives to get CRA debt forgiveness. We can end your debt pain through a consumer proposal, debt consolidation, and credit counselling. Contact a professional that you can trust – Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

The Ira Smith Team has a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FORMER PRO ATHLETES WHO ARE BROKE: EARN OVER $400 MILLION & GO BANKRUPT?

former pro athletes who are brokeFormer pro athletes who are broke: Introduction

I know that earning over $400 million and going bankrupt seems unbelievable to most of you, but it’s true. Just ask Mike Tyson. And he’s not the only one. There are many former pro athletes who are broke. They have made fortunes and lost them, with nothing to show for it. No secure investments, no retirement fund, nothing put away for a rainy day.

Former pro athletes who are broke: They don’t know where the money went

They wake up one day and the money’s all gone, the credit cards have been cancelled, the bank has foreclosed on the mansions and the fleet of exotic cars is being repossessed. The worst part is that most of them don’t even know where the money went.

Former pro athletes who are broke: Evander Holyfield

It’s easy to blow through a fortune. Evander Holyfield spent $230 million in no time flat. He bought a 235-acre Utah estate with 109 rooms that included at least one monthly electric bill of $17,000. There was also a $550,000 loan he took out to pay for landscaping; $200,000 in back taxes, plus alimony and child support for three ex-wives and 11 children.

Former pro athletes who are broke: Boris Becker

It adds up fast when you’re spending like a drunken sailor. Boris Becker is the latest of the sports stars to declare bankruptcy in spite of enormous earnings. The marriages, girlfriends, children and an unsupportable lifestyle finally caught up with Boom Boom. The list of these bankrupt athletes goes on and on and on.

Former pro athletes who are broke: According to Charles Barkley….

​Charles Barkley estimates that 60% – 70% of professional athletes go broke and there are many reasons.

  • Buying lavish gifts and giving money to family and friends
  • Unsupportable lifestyles
  • Mansions around the world
  • Yachts
  • Exotic cars
  • Bad business ventures
  • Bad money managers
  • Not understanding financial matters
  • Zero savings
  • No rainy day fund
  • No retirement plan
    ​

Former pro athletes who are broke: So what does it all mean?

Having enormous amounts of money is no guarantee of financial security as you can see. And financial problems can plague both the rich and not-so-rich.

If you’re having trouble paying the bills, don’t wait until you’ve hit rock bottom. The earlier you seek help, the more options will be available to you. With immediate action and the right plan, the Ira Smith Team can have you on your way to financial peace of mind Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

REDWATER ENERGY CORP. – SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE WHO PAYS CLEANUP COSTS

UPDATE: ON JANUARY 31, 2019 THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA RELEASED ITS DECISION ON THE APPEAL BY THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA ET AL. READ OUR UPDATE, REDWATER ENERGY SUPREME COURT DECIDES, PUBLISHED 9 PM ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2019.

Redwater Energy Corp.: Introduction

By now you have no doubt read articles on the decision in the Redwater Energy Corp. (“Redwater”) case. In a 2-1 decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld the Redwater ruling of the lower Court. The lower Court decision protects, in a bankruptcy, a lender’s secured priority over provincial ecological clean-up requirements.

Redwater Energy Corp.: The Court decision heading to the Supreme Court of Canada

In their majority decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal judges discovered “no mistakes” in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench judgment. The May 2016 lower Court ruling was that provincial laws which are in conflict with the federal bankruptcy legislation, do not supersede the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

The situation centred on a little energy firm which entered into receivership in 2015. It owed $5 million to ATB Financial. At the time of its bankruptcy, Redwater had some producing oil and gas wells. However, it had a lot more properties that were not so productive. The Trustee wanted to sell off the productive wells, and leave the others behind for The Orphan Well Association to deal with.

An appeal from the Alberta Court of Appeal decision will be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada will hear the case on February 15, 2018.

Redwater Energy Corp.: Federal bankruptcy trumps provincial law

The Court addressed a fundamental public policy dilemma. Which has top priority: federal government bankruptcy legislation, or provincial energy law. The Alberta Court of Appeal sided with the lower Court in deciding that the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) is the law that must be looked at. The Province has no ability to force the secured creditor in a bankruptcy scenario to follow the provincial rules. The lender does not need to incur the costs of remediating the unproductive wells when realizing upon the productive assets.

Redwater Energy Corp.: The Alberta Energy Regulator reaction

In response, on December 6, 2017, Alberta introduced more stringent regulations for giving business permits to oil and gas firms. The constraints intend to hold firms responsible for deserting wells as well as disregarding ecological clean-up. Permits that are currently issued can possibly be withdrawn.

It likewise enables the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to do continuous reviews of licensees to aid in taking care of the threat and costs of abandoned unproductive energy assets.

The Orphan Well Association‘s supply currently consists of greater than 1,800 wells needing improvement in Alberta, claimed organization chair Brad Herald. He is also vice-president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

What the AER is going to be taking a look at is earlier history of the corporate operator, and its Directors. So if an operator has:

  • a history of previous issues; or
  • has solvency issues

the regulator is going to want to take a closer look. Presumably this will also apply to the Directors of the applicant. The limitations intend to hold firms answerable for deserting wells as well as overlooking ecological clean-up.

Redwater Energy Corp.: Current status

So currently, trustees can simply ensure that unproductive wells that need cleanup are just capped, leaving the Alberta taxpayer to pay for the cleanup bill. Previously, an oil and gas well permit called for a tiny deposit, an address and insurance coverage. The AER’s position is environmental cleanup costs must be paid by the cash from the sale of the producing wells.

Mr. Herald stated there have actually been various other situations since the Redwater decision where a receiver wishes to disclaim a financially troubled owner’s responsibilities.

The AER and the Orphan Well Association are hoping that the dissenting point of view could boost their chances of success at the Supreme Court of Canada. How will corporate bankruptcies affect the oil and gas markets after more than 2 years of reduced pricing?

Redwater Energy Corp.: How to restructure before your company goes bankrupt

Is your company experiencing cash flow problems? Does your business not have enough funds to meet all of its obligations? Do you know that your company has exposure to environmental cleanup costs and just like Redwater Energy, you know it cannot afford the costs from doing phase i environmental site assessments?

If so, then you need the help of a professional trustee immediately. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we consult with you early, we could develop a restructuring and turnaround strategy. By doing this your business will once again thrive.

Our approach for every person is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. You’re just one telephone call away from taking the important actions to return to leading a healthy, balanced, and stress free life.

redwater energy corp
redwater energy corp
Call a Trustee Now!