Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION IN CANADA: COURT AGREES WITH TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL NEGATIVE = POSITIVE

2 1920x1080 1

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Introduction

I want to tell you about a recent Ontario Court decision about the claims process approved in the Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd. and Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltee (Toys R Us) bankruptcy protection proceedings. The Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada began with the Court making the Initial Order on September 19, 2017. This Initial Order was made under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, as amended (CCAA).

On January 25, 2018, the Toys R Us bankruptcy lawyers attended in Court. There was a motion before the Court to extend the time that Toys “R” Us remains under bankruptcy protection to try to restructure. The motion was also for the Court to approve a draft claims process to quantify the outstanding creditor claims.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The normal claims process

It is the claims procedure which while not novel, is also not regularly seen. That is what I want to talk about.

In a bankruptcy regulated by the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c.B-3 (BIA), creditors are required to prove their claims independently. They do so by providing to the trustee in bankruptcy sworn proof of claim forms that are accompanied by supporting invoices and other pertinent documents. The detailed treatment for creditor claims to be proven and counted is not set out in the CCAA like it is in the BIA.

The Court routinely grants claims procedure orders under the Court’s general powers under ss. 11 and 12 of the CCAA. Claims process orders generally involve developing a technique to interact with all the creditors. This is so they can file their claims. It normally creates a process to communicate to (potential) creditors. It tells them that there is a process they must follow to prove their claims by a specific date.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Why do we even need a claims process?

The claims process includes an opportunity for the company under restructuring proceedings, or its representative, to check all claims. The Monitor, or its representative, can disallow creditors’ claims, either in whole or in part. The claims procedure establishes an adjudication mechanism. If claims are not agreed upon and cannot be settled by negotiation, then the adjudication process begins. This could be either in court or first by arbitration. Decisions on the claims of creditors are then subject to an appeal to the Court.

Claims procedure orders will usually also set a claims bar date. Claims will not be accepted after this date. it is necessary to have a cut off to give the right numbers for voting and distribution purposes. Late claims won’t be allowed. In this way the Monitor achieves finality.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Who has the most up to date books and records?

Most large businesses, including Toys R Us, have readily ascertainable payables outstanding. Sophisticated electronic systems carefully track these amounts, supervised and reviewed by the company’s senior financial staff. The electronic systems not only track purchases and payments, but also the many vendor allowances which are offsets to the accounts payable.

Such offsets include:

  • guaranteed sale provisions, which means if the product does not sell within a specific period, Toys R Us can either return the unsold items to the vendor, or take massive discounts against amounts owing for such products;
  • early payment discounts, promotional allowances, warranty fees, co-op/marketing fees and defect fees; and
  • shipping and warehousing fees

So for large companies like Toys R Us, the vendor will most likely be reconciling their books to what the company shows on its books net of the various offsets.

The recommendation to the Court was for a different type of claims process. As indicated above, the process required by the BIA is a positive one. It requires each creditor to prove the state of its outstanding claims by submitting a sworn proof of claim backed up by invoices.

The draft form of claims process submitted to the Court in the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada proceedings was a different one. It proposed to list creditor claims from the company’s books and records and to provide each known creditor with a simple claim statement. The statement would set out the amount of the respective creditor’s claim recognized by the company. If a creditor agrees with the amount that the company says it owes, the creditor need do nothing and the listed claim will become the final proven claim at the claims bar date. I call this a negative claims process.

Creditors who disagree with the amounts set out in their claims statement can file a dispute notice with the Monitor by the claims bar date to begin a review process.

ISI 4
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Advantages of the negative option

This negative option has certain advantages in companies such as Toys R Us. These advantages include:

  • eliminating the need for filing proofs of claim and supporting evidence in the majority of cases;
  • guarantees that known claims won’t lose out if a certain percentage of creditors to fail to file their claims on a timely basis; and
  • making the claims process streamlined; and
  • making the process easier for recognizing and counting all known creditor claims

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The negative option approved by the Court

The proposed claims process met the needs of the Court to ensure that any claims procedure is both fair and reasonable. The negative option claims process proposed in the Toys R Us case met the needs of the Court. The Court approved the negative claims process in the Order dated January 25, 2018.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Does your company require restructuring?

Your company may not be as large as Toys R US, but it is the most important one to you. Your company may be facing financial challenges, and you have tried everything you can think of to solve the problems. But the red ink still flows. Many families rely on you and your company to continue for their survival. You have invested your money, your blood, sweat and tears in your company, and want to do everything possible to save it.

If you find your company in this situation, then you need the help of a professional trustee immediately. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we consult with you early, we could develop a restructuring and turnaround strategy. By doing this your business will once again thrive. It may not be as complex as the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection process in Canada, but it is the most significant one for you.

Our approach for every person and company is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. You’re just one telephone call away from taking the important actions to return to leading a healthy, balanced, and stress free life.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today.

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA 0
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA NEWS: HOW EDDIE LAMPERT WILL EVENTUALLY DRIVE SEARS HOLDINGS INTO BANKRUPTCY

Sears Canada news: Introduction

The news for Sears Holdings out of the United States is not better than the Sears Canada news. Customers at Sears can’t discover Whirlpool appliances or ladies’ Levi Strauss denim and currently the Wall Street Journal reports they are short on one of the holiday’s hottest toys– the L.O.L. Surprise– because its maker is questioning Sears’ financial wellness.

Sears Canada news: The sad, slow demise of Sears Holdings

Why it matters: Sales at Sears accounted for about 1% of U.S. GDP in the 1960s, however years of competition with big-box stores and online merchants, incorporated with current (mis)management by CEO Eddie Lampert, has whittled down Sears’ financial position extensively.

Sears Canada news: (Mis) management

I put “mis” in brackets because, I am not convinced that Mr. Lampert’s plan was to make Sears a successful retailer. He may have just seen assets with value that he could liquidate to reap financial rewards from until Sears can no longer function as a viable retailer. So what we see today with Sears, may very well have been his management plan all along. (See more on this hypothesis below).

Sears Canada news: The Wall Street Journal article

Currently distributors are minimizing deliveries, tightening funding terms, or declining to work with the merchant completely from concern of being stiffed if Sears is forced into bankruptcy. This is all according to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article on October 31, 2017 titled: “Inside the Decline of Sears, the Amazon of the 20th Century”.

Sears Canada news: What the analysts say about Sears Holdings

Bill Dreher covers Sears Holdings for Susquehanna Financial Group. WSJ states that “We see no viable path for Sears to succeed as a retailer,”. He worries that the suppliers are starting to lose confidence in Sears. He also suggests that this is what put Sears subsidiary Kmart into bankruptcy in 2002, when it was an independent company. Lampert took control of Kmart after its bankruptcy and then leveraged its stock to acquire Sears in 2005.

The fraying patience of vendors is clear as reported by the WSJ:

  • LG Electronics and Samsung are demanding money in advance to supply certain products.
  • Sears sued two long time manufacturers of its Craftsman tools brand before this year to keep them shipping product to stores. This is despite the Craftsman brand name was sold by Sears months earlier.
  • Clorox is imposing harder payment terms for its well-known products.

    3bestaward
    sears canada news

Sears Canada news: Sears Holdings CEO

Mr. Lampert’s management style is partly responsible for Sears’ current battles, according to the article. The WSJ reports that Lampert took on a strategy of skimping on investment and upgrades and instead used that cash to buy back Sears shares from certain shareholders.

This approach maintained Sears stock price, until the financial crisis hit. It is no secret that Americans’ preference for online shopping grew significantly, which has negatively affected all brick and mortar retailers. Sears is no exception.

The WSJ articles states that Eddie Lampert doesn’t visit Sears headquarters greater than a pair of times annually. He likewise hardly ever visits stores and favours that top Sears executives do the same. He argues that it is more affordable and more efficient to connect with store managers over videoconference.

Sears Canada news: Sears Holdings continues to cannibalize itself

Sears Holdings has closed unprofitable stores and spun off lines of business. The merchant’s shop footprint has been more than cut in half. Since 2010, the number of Sears locations has dropped from 4,000 stores to 1,250 currently. Sears’ current strategy is to shut a lot more. From 2010 to 2016, its sales have dropped by almost half, from $43.3 billion to $22.1 billion last year.

Sears Canada news: The financials tell the story

Sears had just one quarter of favorable same-store sales growth between 2008 to the 1st quarter of 2017, according information from retail study company Retail Metrics. During that very same time, Sears’ operating income was negative in all but 8 of 37 quarters.

Sears is a laggard in a lagging field. The business has suffered EBIDTA losses, and requires cash for operating expenditures such as:

Sears Canada news: Sears Holdings has fended off bankruptcy; for now!

Sears has been able to fend off default for many years mostly with store closures, staff lay offs, asset sales and loans from Lampert’s hedge fund ESL Investments. In trying to revive sales, Sears has partnered with Amazon to market Kenmore items, tested new store styles and revived its holiday catalogue.

Few traditional stores have actually thrived in this period of online shopping. But Sears, which was at one time one of the most innovative retailers in America, has been left more than most retailers partly due to Lampert’s decisions.

For these reasons, one day I fear that there will be a big Sears clearance. Sears Holdings news out of the United States will be the same one day as what we already know about the Sears Canada news. It is only a matter of time, IMO anyway.

Sears Canada news: It doesn’t need to be your company’s news

If you’re attempting to discover a way to reorganize your firm’s debt, to ensure that you could avoid a Sears situation, call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we consult with you early, we could develop a restructuring and turnaround strategy. By doing this your business will once again thrive.

Our approach for every person is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. You’re just one telephone call away from taking the important actions to return to leading a healthy, balanced, and stress free life.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONLINE BANKRUPTCY SEARCH: THIS CANADIAN INSOLVENCY RECORDS SEARCH RENEWAL (IRS) WON’T CHASE YOU FOR MONEY!

2

Online bankruptcy search: Introduction

This blog is about the Canadian government’s plan to update its online bankruptcy search function. It is an update to our November 15, 2017 Brandon’s Blog titled: “BANKRUPTCY FILINGS FREE PUBLIC RECORDS: WILL FREE SEARCHES TURN YOU INTO A PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY RECORDS SLEUTH FOR THE TRUTH”.

As you can imagine, I have a schedule for creating Brandon’s Blog. I created the above-mentioned blog and related video on the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) insolvency records search renewal (IRS) program and posted it for publishing on November 15. After doing so, the OSB published an update on its IRS program. The purpose of this blog is to give you the updated information.

The OSB November 2017 update offers more information about the IRS post it published in August 2017.

Online bankruptcy search: Updating the technology

The OSB has stated that its updated IRS system will consist of modern-day safeguards. The new IRS will secure the private information of people or companies who have either filed or become bankrupt or who have filed a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Online bankruptcy search: The legislative need

Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), the Superintendent of Bankruptcy is required to keep and make available a public document of all personal and corporate bankruptcies and proposals. The public document, includes the names of the insolvent debtors given statutory stay of proceedings from the commitment to pay their financial debts.

This record consists of vital information needed to administer the bankruptcy system. It is also important for the running of an efficient and well-functioning Canadian marketplace.

Online bankruptcy search: The purpose of the current system

The current Bankruptcy and Insolvency Records Search data source offers Canadians with access to search the public database for specific people or companies that have submitted a (consumer) proposal or bankruptcy, as the case may be. It is also for creditors to see if any party applying for credit are in an insolvency proceeding.

Online bankruptcy search: Uses of the current system

The OSB’s database allows for searches for:

  • creditors to take necessary activity with respect to specific insolvency filings;
  • insolvent debtors, either an individual or Directors of a company, to acquire information about their bankruptcy or proposal;
  • Licensed Insolvency Trustees (LIT) to properly administer insolvency estates;
  • people and companies making informed credit choices on people or organizations applying for loans or trade credit.

Online bankruptcy search: How many times a year is the current system searched?

Each year the current database, (which has a cost of $8 each search for public users), is searched about 800,000 times by individual Canadians, including LITs (for whom there is no charge). Any member of the public who pays the charge could browse the government insolvency records. The present system does not limit access in any other way.

Online bankruptcy search: The proposed new IRS

The OSB will be changing the current system. It is outdated by today’s privacy standards. The OSB will create a new IRS. While still attending to the legislative needs to give access to a public document of bankruptcies, it will substantially make individual information of debtors more secure.

As compared to the old system, the IRS will consist of many steps developed to particularly restrict the disclosure and use of the individual’s details of the debtors who file for an insolvency proceeding.

3bestaward
online bankruptcy search

Online bankruptcy search: New IRS protections

Examples of the brand-new protections which are not available in the current system, to shield disclosure of individual information, are:

  • Individual information entered will just be confirmed, not offered in a search result.
  • Searchers will need to recognize the first, last name, as well as date of birth of a debtor. This is required to get verification of an individual in bankruptcy or who has filed a (consumer) proposal.
  • The new system will no longer supply access to bankrupts’ documents that do not match the search requirements. The new IRS will be search specific, and not providing a complete list of names matching search criteria.
  • For every right search, a decreased measure of individual information will certainly be returned in the public search results page. Home addresses and complete postal codes will no longer be included in search results.
  • The public document search retention will be lower. The duration for the storage of details will be 10 years post-discharge.
  • The new system will consist of innovations designed to decrease the possibility for unexpected uses of the information. For example, machine-based searches.

Online bankruptcy search: Meeting the needs of LITs

The OSB has talked to the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) as part of developing the IRS. The OSB has dealt with comments received thus far. The IRS layout will certainly make best use of technology to protect personal information. The new system will fulfill the specific needs of LITs, in meeting their insolvency estate management and legal requirements.

It must be kept in mind that the OSB has no plan to remove the $8 charge from the current system before its being retired. The first introduction of the fee was designed exclusively to sustain the OSB’s operating expenses in developing and keeping the existing system.

The new IRS will consist of many measures to appropriately reduce disclosure and increase the defense of personal information of debtors. The OSB says that it has no proof that a service charge with the brand-new IRS would better safeguard debtor information against improper use.

Online bankruptcy search: This IRS won’t chase you for money!

As a result, the OSB says it will look at and suggest getting rid of the historic governing arrangement which permitted the charging of a cost to get access to the public record. The OSB states that this will align with Treasury Board Policy. That is why this IRS, is not planning to ever chase you for money!

Online bankruptcy search: What to do if you think you might need an insolvency process

Are you or your company insolvent and in need of restructuring? Are you scared to become another entry in an online bankruptcy search? If so, the worst thing you can do is procrastinate and not take positive steps to remedy your situation. Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy designed specifically for you.

online bankruptcy search 1
online bankruptcy search
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY RETAINS ATTORNEYS

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Introduction

As claims against Harvey Weinstein transform from a few into an avalanche, several of the loan providers backing his named firm have actually started speaking to bankruptcy advisors about filing for bankruptcy protection, say sources knowledgeable about the issue. They are concerned that The Weinstein Company (TWC) may be filing for bankruptcy protection. Why do you ask? I will explain below.

Everyone is lawyering up

A team of The Weinstein Company’s financial institution loan providers have involved restructuring lawyers from Sidley Austin to work as advisors in case of a filing for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. They have actually likewise held pitches to work with an economic consultant to give calculated restructuring guidance.

TWC has retained the law office of O’Melveny & Myers, while Moelis & Company is acting as an economic consultant to the board. The firm has involved FTI Consulting, a financial advisory and restructuring firm.

3bestaward
filing for bankruptcy protection

Can The Weinstein Company borrow any more?

TWC has actually been attempting to raise money. It has also tried to offer itself totally to a brand-new financier. Talks have not yet produced a deal. Also if it locates a purchaser, a sale might have to be applied in the context of a bankruptcy, to “clean” the assets from the mounting claims against TWC.

What are its chances of a successful restructuring?

The Weinstein Company has long shot of restructuring, however, filing for bankruptcy protection would certainly provide possible purchasers with the chance to buy its movie collection and other assets free from the claims against both Harvey Weinstein and TWC.

TWC might use bankruptcy court-approved public auctions to discover purchasers and after that make use of those sale proceeds to establish a fund against which claims can be made and sorted out by the bankruptcy trustee. TWC is certainly going to meet claims over its failure to stop Harvey’s transgressions.

Is The Weinstein Company brand too toxic for it to survive?

TWC has borrowed millions of dollars in the last few years. It now faces the real possibility that its now-toxic brand name will materially influence future company chances of survival in the longer term. The cases associated with Weinstein’s alleged sex-related criminal offences will probably result in adverse annual report reporting obligations. This will further worry TWC’s lenders.

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Watch for all the lawsuits – even the ones not involving sex!

Harvey Weinstein has actually currently filed a claim against the business, looking for accessibility to his earlier company e-mail account to strengthen his defence against the sexual harassment claims against him. A bankruptcy would likely leave behind just a shadow of the firm that might really well have no choice but to file a claim against Harvey Weinstein for sinking the company. In other words, what we have here is The Weinstein Company horror movie.

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company insolvent and needs to restructure? Is your business viable but can only employ people and carry on business if it can restructure its debt? Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like The Weinstein Company.

filing for bankruptcy protection

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVERSHIP BANKRUPTCY DIFFERENCE CANADA: WHAT A TRUSTEE SAYS ABOUT IT

Introduction

The purpose of this blog is to discuss the corporate receivership bankruptcy difference Canada. Every general security agreement defines exactly how the secured lender will certainly deal with obtaining his/her cash when it comes to default. One means to do this is by selecting a receiver.

A receiver or receiver/manager is an individual/company licensed by the Federal Government to act as a licensed insolvency trustee. The receiver can be appointed either by an instrument in writing or by a court order. A receivership administration falls under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), where the receiver takes possession and control over the assets to of the insolvent business.

The receiver or receiver/manager will certainly seize the properties covered under the lender’s security or covered by the court order. The receiver will also develop a plan to market the assets for sale. After paying any type of priority claims as well as the receivership administration costs, the net funds are paid to the first secured creditor.

receivership bankruptcy difference canada

Can you have both at the very same time?

Sometimes there is both a bankruptcy plus a receivership. Receivership is a treatment for secured creditors, such as financial institutions. Bankruptcy is a treatment for unsecured creditors.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Bankruptcy

A business could be placed right into bankruptcy by any one of the following methods:

  1. a creditor could apply for a bankruptcy order putting the business right into bankruptcy through the courts;
  2. the directors could assign the corporation right into bankruptcy;
  3. a restructuring proposal could be voted down at the meeting of creditors; or
  4. a restructuring proposal could be annulled by the trustee or creditor for non-compliance.

There are many reasons that a corporation could go into bankruptcy. These consist of the following:

  1. The firm has defaulted under its premises lease, the landlord distrains against the firm’s possessions. A bankruptcy or a notice to make a proposal filed before the property owner finishes the sale of assets defeats the lease distraint.
  2. The firm has unsecured assets (i.e., possessions without a lender’s security registered against it) that are available to be realized upon. Also, the firm cannot carry on business any longer.
  3. If a restructuring proposal is submitted, but the company could not get adequate funding to continue its business and complete the proposal.
  4. To reorganize the statutory priorities.
  5. To officially bring the business to an end as well as give a complete report to the creditors so they will not believe the principals engaged in any kind of misbehaviour.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Corporate Bankruptcy

In a company bankruptcy, the licensed insolvency trustee seizes all the business’s properties plus deals with all the creditors. The directors and management of the company accept the authority of the trustee; if requested by the trustee, they can as well as aid the trustee in his/her tasks. This eliminates them from all the stress of dealing with the creditors as well as running the cash-starved business.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Making the Application to Put a Debtor Into Bankruptcy

If a creditor is incapable of recovering the amount owed to it with any one of the readily available techniques which can be done, they may look to a bankruptcy application. This is especially so having actually acquired a judgment for the quantum owing which has not been satisfied. The BIA allows for the licensed insolvency trustee, once appointed, to take possession in an organized way, the assets of an insolvent debtor, to realize upon those assets and to then distribute the funds according to the scheme of priority in the BIA.

The BIA allows for the benefit of both bankrupts and their creditors. While the Act is not planned for usage as a device for the collection of private financial obligations, this may be the case in specific situations.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: When is a Creditor Allowed making a Bankruptcy Application?

An unsecured creditor could apply for a bankruptcy order where:

  1. the lender is owed $1,000 or even more on an unsecured basis, and
  2. there has actually been an act of bankruptcy by the borrower within the 6 months that come before the filing of the application. Keep in mind that a secured lender can value its security at less than the overall amount owing to develop a partly unsecured debt.

The BIA states that acts of bankruptcy consist of the following:

  1. if in Canada or elsewhere he makes an assignment of his property to a trustee for the benefit of his creditors generally, whether it is an assignment authorized by this Act or not;
  2. if in Canada or elsewhere the debtor makes a fraudulent gift, delivery or transfer of the debtor’s property or of any part of it;
  3. if in Canada or elsewhere the debtor makes any transfer of the debtor’s property or any part of it, or creates any charge on it, that would under this Act be void or, in the Province of Quebec, null as a fraudulent preference;
  4. if, with intent to defeat or delay his creditors, he departs out of Canada, or, being out of Canada, remains out of Canada, or departs from his dwelling house or otherwise absents himself;
  5. if the debtor permits any execution or other process issued against the debtor under which any of the debtor’s property is seized, levied on or taken in execution to remain unsatisfied until within five days after the time fixed by the executing officer for the sale of the property or for fifteen days after the seizure, levy or taking in execution, or if any of the debtor’s property has been sold by the executing officer, or if the execution or other process has been held by the executing officer for a period of fifteen days after written demand for payment without seizure, levy or taking in execution or satisfaction by payment, or if it is returned endorsed to the effect that the executing officer can find no property on which to levy or to seize or take, but if interpleader or opposition proceedings have been instituted with respect to the property seized, the time elapsing between the date at which the proceedings were instituted and the date at which the proceedings are finally disposed of, settled or abandoned shall not be taken into account in calculating the period of fifteen days;
  6. if he exhibits to any meeting of his creditors any statement of his assets and liabilities that shows that he is insolvent, or presents or causes to be presented to any such meeting a written admission of his inability to pay his debts;
  7. if he assigns, removes, secretes or disposes of or attempts or is about to assign, remove, secrete or dispose of any of his property with the intent to defraud, defeat or delay his creditors or any of them;
  8. if he gives notice to any of his creditors that he has suspended or that he is about to suspend the payment of his debts;
  9. if he defaults in any proposal made under this Act; and if he ceases to meet his liabilities generally as they become due.
  10. if he ceases to meet his liabilities generally as they become due.

Keep in mind that in most of the situations above, the creditor does not need to show that the borrower cannot pay various other creditors. In the last situation, the creditor should show that more than just its own debt is not being paid. Unique situations would differentiate matters though.

Unique scenarios can consist of allegations of fraud, near-fraud or those other transactions which fall under the types that would seem to be attackable by a trustee. At least on a prima facie basis.

It should, nonetheless, be remembered that stringent evidence of both your unsecured debt and an act of bankruptcy is required to have an individual or business judged bankrupt.

 

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Under What Circumstances Should a Creditor Make An Application For A Bankruptcy Order?

Making an application for a bankruptcy order to put a debtor into bankruptcy is no little job. Prior to choosing this option, consider the following:

  1. the presence and amounts of claims that could take priority over your unsecured creditor status;
  2. the dollar measure of unsecured debt ranking on the same level with your financial debt (i.e., each unsecured creditor is paid according to the calculated share based on the measure of his/her debt);
  3. the existence of questionable transactions or transfers undervalue within the three-month to five-year evaluation period before the declaration of bankruptcy;
  4. your very own history of repayments from the debtor/borrower in addition to the normal payment patterns in the 3 months before the date of bankruptcy; as well as
  5. the legitimacy of any kind of security you might hold.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: The Bankruptcy Application Can Be Very Useful

Think about:

  1. has the debtor actually moved the residential property to a related party for inadequate or no consideration;
  2. where the debtor does not want to lose a specific part of its property (e.g. a private yacht, unique cars and truck or shares in a firm) or does not want its transactions and events to be inspected by a trustee and/or creditors;
  3. the debtor (being an individual) expects an inheritance;
  4. where the debtor (being an individual) needs to be an officer, director and/or shareholder of several businesses;
  5. the debtor (being an individual) might have his/her expert certification or licence from which he/she derives income compromised or lost as an outcome of being ruled a bankrupt;
  6. when the bankruptcy of the debtor would cause him/her to lose the ability to generally conduct business, such as required to use a trust account or employment requires the need to be bonded; or
  7. being a bankrupt would cause the company or individual to lose the advantage of a specific useful agreement, lease, or company.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: How Does a Creditor Make The Application For A Bankruptcy Order?

The creditor desiring to file the application will certainly need a lawyer to prepare the needed documents to make the bankruptcy application. The lawyer will serve the motion material and attend for the bankruptcy order. For an uncontested motion, the lawyer appears before the Bankruptcy Registrar who is a Master of the Court. If opposed, the matter can only be heard by a Judge.

The creditor has to additionally make arrangements with a licensed insolvency trustee to act will need to guarantee the trustee’s fee and costs incurred by the trustee where there are not enough proceeds from the sale of assets. A lot of times it is likewise needed to give the trustee a cash retainer.

When the Bankruptcy Order is made, the licensed insolvency trustee starts the bankruptcy administration. All actions against the insolvent are stayed.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: What If You’re Company Has Too Much Debt?

Is your company insolvent? Are you looking for solutions? The Ira Smith Team is here to offer alternatives to restructuring and turnaround services however, if required, we also act as a licensed insolvency trustee in bankruptcy matters. We offer help in Vaughan as well as throughout the GTA.

Are you an individual or company who feels your situation is hopeless? Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and put in place the plan MADE JUST FOR YOU. The plan will free you from the burden of your financial challenges. With our help, you will go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Our motto is Starting Over, Starting Now! Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can help you overcome your financial difficulties. Contact us today.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

#VIDEO – BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION ONLINE: WHAT EVERY CANADIAN OUGHT TO KNOW#

Is there bankruptcy information online?

There is a large amount of bankruptcy information online. Just go to the website of any Licensed Insolvency Trustee or bankruptcy lawyer. There is information about:

The Ira Smith Trustee website

On our website, you will find bankruptcy information online such as:

The other source for information online

You can also find relevant bankruptcy information online at the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada website.

To take action you have to take it offline

Once you have gotten the online information, to take action, you need to take it offline. It is not possible in Canada to file online yourself.

To file either a consumer proposal to make debt settlement or bankruptcy, you need to select a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee administers the insolvency process in Canada.

The 10 Step Program of the Canadian Insolvency System

  1. Meet with a trustee to talk about your personal situation and your options.
  2. Work with the trustee to complete the required forms.
  3. The trustee filing your consumer proposal or bankruptcy and notifying your creditors.
  4. You attend a meeting of creditors if required.
  5. You attend two counselling sessions.
  6. Subject to your provincial exemptions, the trustee sells your assets; you may also have to make surplus income payments to the trustee.
  7. In certain circumstances, you may have to attend an examination by an officer at the OSB.
  8. The trustee prepares a report to the OSB describing your actions during the bankruptcy.
  9. You attend the discharge hearing if required.
  10. Your discharge and then the trustee completes the administration.

This is why to take action in the Canadian insolvency system you have to take it offline

How To Take Action To Achieve Debt Settlement

If you’re in deep financial difficulties and are looking for a way out, there is help for you. You need help from experts in debt – professional trustees.

We are:

  1. regulated by the Canadian government, as are our fees;
  2. licensed and have undergone a background check by the RCMP;
  3. subject to a stringent code of ethics; and
  4. required to maintain our competence by completing ongoing mandatory professional development each year.

Are you an individual or company who feels your situation is hopeless? Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and put in place the plan MADE JUST FOR YOU. The plan will free you from the burden of your financial challenges. With our help, you will go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. Starting Over, Starting Now you can free yourself from debt.

THIS VLOG WAS INSPIRED IN PART BY OUR eBOOK – PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY CANADA: Not because you are a dummy, because you need to get your life back on track

bankruptcy information online

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

#VIDEO – HOUSEHOLD DEBT IN CANADA CRISIS#

Household debt in Canada can lead us into crisis

On January 16, 2016, the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) released its report titled: “Household Indebtedness and Financial Vulnerability“. A summary of the PBO’s findings are:

In the third quarter of 2015, total household debt in Canada reached 171 per cent of disposable income. In other words, for every $100 of disposable income, households had debt obligations of $171. This is the highest level recorded since 1990 and the highest level. The report also found that:

  • Among G7 countries, Canada has experienced the largest increase in household debt relative to income since 2000. Households in Canada have become more indebted than any other G7 country over recent history.
  • The Bank of Canada conducted its analysis. It suggests that low-interest rates, higher house prices and financial innovation have contributed to the increase in household indebtedness.
  • A financially vulnerable household is required to devote a real part of its income to service its debt. It faces greater exposure to negative income and interest rate shocks, and is more likely to be delinquent in its debt payments.
  • The PBO does not see the trend correcting itself until 2020.

We discussed the issue of rising household debt in Canada in the past

The PBO report produced a graph on household debt ratios

Household Indebtedness and Financial Vulnerability,household debt in canada,canadian household debt,canadian household debt statistics,average canadian household debt,canadian household debt to income ratio,statistics canada,canadian household debt by province,canadian household debt to income ratio graph,canadian household debt ratio calculator,canadian household debt 2015,ira smith trustee,household debt in canada
Graph courtesy of the Report of the PBO “Household
Indebtedness and
Financial
Vulnerability” dated January 19, 2016

The PBO’s point in this graphical analysis is that the projected increase in the total household debt service ratio (DSR) to 15.9 per cent would be 3.1 percentage points above the long-term historical average of 12.8 per cent (from 1990Q1 to 2015Q3). It would also be almost one full percentage point above its highest level over the past 25 years, 14.9 per cent , which was reached in 2007Q4.

There is apparently no end in sight for Canadians’ appetite to take on more debt, and it takes more income to service the higher debt. Unfortunately, the only thing that will seem to break this cycle is some shock to the Canadian economic system, and this will not be good news for many who will find themselves strung out on debt and not able to service it when the shock comes.

What to do if you or your company can no longer service your debt?

Is your household debt in Canada out of control? Have those spending habits creeped into your company’s spending? If so, you need to contact us now to get a solution, before bankruptcy is your only alternative.

We help people and companies throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) facing financial crisis in need of restructuring and turnaround, receivership or bankruptcy that need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now. The Ira Smith Team brings a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, and we deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t worry about debt; instead take immediate action.

Call us today. If you or your company is trapped in high debt, you need a professional trustee to help you manage the situation before it reaches a critical stage where bankruptcy or receivership is your only option. We have been able to help many people and companies carry out a successful debt settlement programs or corporate restructuring and turnarounds.

It all began with a first consultation. The first step is a realistic cash-flow budget. Successful completion of restructuring, will free you or your company from the burden of your financial challenges to go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY CANADA: Not Because You Are A Dummy, Because You Need To Get Your Life Back On Track, ira smith trustee, toronto bankruptcy, vaughan bankruptcy, consumer proposal, bankruptcy laws in bc, bankruptcy information online, canadian bankruptcy act, bia, canadian bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy protection canada, canadian bankruptcy laws and regulations, personal bankruptcy protection canada, canadian personal bankruptcy laws, canadian personal bankruptcies laws

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

HOW SECRET REAL ESTATE FLIPPING BECOMES COSTLY FLOPPING

receiver mortgagee $6.2 million flipped $9 million, property flip, real estate flipping, bankruptcy, professional trustees, receiver, Receiver, receivership, trustee, ira smith trustee, Ahmed Baig, Soundair Corp., restructuring and turnaround, Ahmed Baig, Meridian Credit Union, Meridian Credit Union Limited v. Baig, bankruptcy trustee, starting over starting nowThe television air waves are clogged with real estate reality shows – buying properties, selling properties, real estate flipping properties, renovating properties, income properties… There’s a real estate show that demonstrates every facet of the business and it all looks very simple. But I’m pretty sure that not one real estate reality show told you that real estate flipping when purchasing from a Receiver in Ontario can land you in a heap of legal trouble. Here is the story surrounding the Court of Appeal for Ontario case of Meridian Credit Union Limited v. Baig, 2016 ONCA 150.

Real Estate Flipping

Mr. Ahmed Baig’s corporation bought a downtown Toronto property located 984 Bay Street in a receivership sale. The property was purchased from the court-appointed Receiver with court approval, for $6.2 million in August 2006. Before the deal went through Mr. Baig secretly flipped the property for $9 million, netting a tidy profit of $2.8 million. The Receiver had no clue that when Mr. Baig bought the property he’d already agreed to resell it to Yellowstone Property Consultants (Yellowstone). In fact the Receiver assumed Yellowstone was Baig’s company and neither Mr. Baig nor his lawyer corrected that misunderstanding. On the advice of counsel the deal was structured so that the property would go directly to Yellowstone to avoid duplicate land transfer taxes. What a score for a little paperwork and some creative bookkeeping!

The Flopping

It’s hard to keep a $2.8 million real estate flipping secret and in 2009 Meridian Credit Union Limited (Meridian), the first ranking secured creditor at the time of the sale, and the Applicant in the receivership case, discovered the resale to Yellowstone. Meridian sued Mr. Baig. The Receiver, obliged to maximize the return on assets of any sale, argued it would never have recommended court approval had it known about the real estate flipping.

The Court noted that one of the terms of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale entered into between the Receiver and Mr. Baig’s company stated:

“Article 39 of the agreement of purchase and sale provided that Mr. Baig could assign the agreement to a corporation to be incorporated for the purposes of the sale with the receiver’s consent which could not be unreasonably withheld. However, in respect of any other assignment, the receiver had a consent right and its consent “may be arbitrarily withheld”.”

In the original case in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, The Honourable Mr. Justice F.L. Myers found that:

“Apart from the normal circumstances where any buyer would be reluctant to tell its vendor that there was another buyer available who would pay substantially more for the property, the fact that the sale occurred in a receivership is important. A receiver requires approval of the court to make a material sale of the debtor’s property. To obtain court approval, a receiver must establish that it engaged in a fair and commercially reasonable process to try to obtain fair market value for the property to maximize realization for the creditors. See: Royal Bank of Canada v. Soundair Corp., 1991 CanLII 2727 (ON CA), 1991 CanLII 2727 (ONCA). If a Receiver learns that it has undersold property it can be in a very difficult position in which it is contractually bound to seek court approval for its sale but it must, at the same time, disclose to the creditors and to the court that it has not maximized realization.”

The Honourable Mr. Justice Myers made the finding that Mr. Baig is liable to Meridian for fraudulent misrepresentation in an amount to be determined by the court.

The Appeal Court Ruled On The Real Estate Flipping

Upholding the lower court decision, the Court of Appeal found Ahmed Baig had deliberately misled the Receiver handling the receivership by failing to alert them to the resale through the real estate flipping. “In certain circumstances, silence and half-truths can amount to a misrepresentation,” the Appeal Court ruled. “Both the appellant and his counsel wanted to prevent the Receiver from discovering the sale to Yellowstone, because the $2.8 million differential in the price would jeopardize court approval,” the Appeal Court said. “Both the appellant and his counsel actively hid the agreement,” the Appeal Court found. Instead of making a fast $2.8 million Mr. Baig was held responsible for the misrepresentations made by his lawyer, who knew documents given to the receiver were false. While Baig had no obligation to disclose the resale agreement, the court decided that his failure to correct the misunderstanding that Yellowstone was his company amounted to fraudulent misrepresentation.

Would this real estate flipping decision be the same in a bankruptcy?

In my view, this ruling would also extend to bankruptcy administrations, as the bankruptcy trustee would be required to obtain either inspector or court approval, and be held to the same high standards as in this case. As professional trustees we are extremely ethical and would never support a fraud or blatant misrepresentation. We help individuals and companies throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) facing financial crisis in need of restructuring and turnaround, receivership or bankruptcy that need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now. The Ira Smith Team brings a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, and we deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t worry about debt; instead take immediate action.

Call us today. If you or your company is trapped in high debt, you need a professional trustee to help you manage the situation before it reaches a critical stage where bankruptcy or receivership is your only option. We have been able to help many individuals and companies carry out a successful debt settlement programs or corporate restructuring and turnarounds. It all began with an initial consultation. The first step is a realistic cash-flow budget. Successful completion of such a program, will free you from the burden of your financial challenges to go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RESTRUCTURING AND TURNAROUND IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE! HERE’S WHY

restructuring and turnaround, assignment in bankruptcy, bankruptcy, bankruptcies, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, Companies Creditors Arrangement Act, CCAA, Casimir Capital Ltd., deemed assignment in bankruptcy, trustee, proposal, starting over starting nowA restructuring and turnaround process that does not garner the support of the creditors can lead to bankruptcy. Bankruptcy ends up being a result of an attempt to save the business that has gone awry.

There are two statutes which set out the law of bankruptcy and insolvency law in Canada, including the Canadian regimes for a corporate restructuring and turnaround:

  • Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”): Contains 275 sections and is intended to be a complete code for bankruptcies. The law dealing with bankruptcies is within the BIA itself
  • Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”): Deals with corporate restructuring and turnaround (as does the BIA) and contains 22 sections. Most of the law dealing with the CCAA has developed from Court decisions as the statute is very thin!

Once in motion it’s extremely difficult to set aside an assignment into bankruptcy. That is why the interests of all stakeholders must be carefully considered and addressed in order for a restructuring and turnaround plan to be successful. Take for example the motion which was recently brought before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (In Bankruptcy and Insolvency) by Casimir Capital Ltd., an intermediary or broker of various underwritings and placements. Up until January 31, 2014 when it resigned, it was a member and registered as a securities dealer with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”).

Casimir Capital Ltd. brought a motion seeking to set aside its deemed assignment into bankruptcy, and a review of a decision of a trustee to allow certain creditors to vote against a proposal put forth by the firm to settle its debts. At that meeting, 93.7% of the creditors voted against the proposal. However, in the motion, Casimir argued that some of the creditors should not have been allowed to vote as it disputes the validity of their claims.

The decision: In Re Casimir Capital, 2015 ONSC 2819 (CanLII), Casimir’s motion was dismissed. In his ruling The Honourable Mr. Justice Pattillo stated that the trustee “…was correct in allowing the Disputed Creditors to vote.” and “…the steps taken by the Proposal Trustee in reviewing and validating the proofs of claims filed, including the Disputed Creditors, for the purpose of voting at the first meeting were more than sufficient.”

The court noted that even if the votes of the disputed creditors were disallowed, 69.4% of the other creditors, whose claims are not disputed, voted against the proposal. The Court also agreed with the trustee that the debtor’s motion to have its deemed assignment in bankruptcy set aside fails in any event because even if the disputed creditors votes are set aside, the votes of the remaining creditors still defeat the proposal. As you can see, this restructuring and turnaround attempt was doomed for failure, as essentially none of the needs of the stakeholders were successfully addressed. Therefore in this case, a deemed assignment in bankruptcy was the end result. I am sure the professionals involved did the best they could with what they had to work with, but it obviously was not enough.

Unfortunately many companies and individuals find themselves in financial difficulties and surviving these financial difficulties can be a daunting task. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has helped many companies to not only survive, but prosper. Our corporate restructuring and turnaround strategies not only deal with short term crisis management but the long term viability of corporations. Contact us today so that Starting Over, Starting Now once again your company can a financially viable entity.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TARGET CANADA CLOSING: $5.4 BILLION AND COUNTING

Target Canada closing, Target Canada, Target Canada, Target Corporation, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, CCAA, restructuring of insolvent corporations, restructuring and turnaround, business failure, orderly liquidation, Zellers, starting over starting now, financial viability, financial hardship, receivership or bankruptcyTarget Canada closing was announced on January 15, 2015, when Target Canada Co. and related entities commenced court-supervised restructuring proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”). The CCAA, which is a Federal statute normally used for the restructuring of insolvent corporations with debts over $5 million, in order to preserve all or a portion of the business and jobs. This time, rather than being used for a restructuring and turnaround, it is being used to provide for an orderly liquidation.

What went wrong? Target Canada is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the United States-based retailer Target Corporation. Target Corporation was founded in 1902 as Dayton Hudson Corporation, and is one of the largest retailers in the United States of America. You would think they had the experience to avoid such a disaster. It seems that everything went wrong and right now Target Canada estimates that this business failure will result in a loss of $5.4 BILLION!

The mistakes made by Target Canada and its US based parent seem to be very basic. The mistakes made leading to the Target Canada closing can be summarized in the following 9 point list:

1. Walk before you run – Target Corporation’s leadership saw expansion into Canada as an opportunity to extend the Target shopping experience to a broader group of people and thereby expand its revenues and profits. They also believed that there were significant opportunities in the Canadian market that made their strategies well positioned to succeed.

However, rather than starting off with a few stores in select Canadian markets, they began in 2011 by purchasing the net amount of 135 store leases from Zellers Inc. for a net purchase price of $1.6 billion. Perhaps a more modest start would not have put so much financial pressure on Target Canada from the very beginning.

This is reason number one leading to Target Canada closing.

2. Failure to implement your plan in a reasonable period of time – Although Target Canada entered Canada in 2011 through the purchase of the leases, they first undertook necessary renovations and leasehold improvements before Target Canada opened at many of the former Zellers locations under the Target banner. The first stores did not open until March 2013 – more than 2 years after the decision was made to acquire the Canadian locations.

This obviously gave Target Canada’s competitors a long lead time to plan for the Target invasion. The major competitors include Wal-Mart, The Bay, Sears, and also major supermarket chains like Loblaws, electronic retailers like Best Buy and Future Shop, and home improvement stores like Canadian Tire, Home Depot, Rona and Lowes.

This is reason number two leading to Target Canada closing.

3. Miscalculation of Demand for your Product – The opening of that many stores resulted in market densification – particularly in large cities served by more than one Target store – and reduced the impact of many of the new store openings. There were too many stores for the marketplace.

This is reason number three leading to Target Canada closing.

4. Poor Supply-Chain Management – Target Canada encountered significant supply chain issues. Stores were often: (i) out-of-stock for important merchandise, resulting in consumer dissatisfaction; and (ii) over-stocked on other merchandise, necessitating discounts to manage the inventory and impairing operating margins. These supply chain issues created a poor first impression. Therefore, many potential customers appear to have returned to or maintained the shopping practices they had before Target’s entry into Canada where such problems didn’t exist.

This is reason number four leading to Target Canada closing.

5. Tinkering with a proven modelCanadian consumers expected Target Canada to follow Target’s U.S. prices, which is a significant source of loyalty to the Target brand. Rather than match or reflect the U.S. prices in Canada, its pricing model was designed to compete with other similar Canadian retailers and included generally higher prices than Target’s U.S. stores. This appears to have limited Target Canada’s ability to distinguish itself in the competitive Canadian retail marketplace. It appears to me that Target Canada did not attempt to distinguish itself on a superior customer experience and did not attempt to distinguish itself in its pricing model.

Many of the Target Canada suppliers, either directly or through related entities, supplied merchandise to both the Canadian stores and Target Corporation’s U.S. stores, and many of those cross-over vendors have operations in Canada. Couldn’t Target have used its buying clout to not have Target Canada’s pricing model to be the same as its Canadian competitors?

This is reason number five leading to Target Canada closing.

6. No online presence – Need I say any more? Any home-based business owner knows you need to have an online presence today.

Although Target US has an established and successful online retail business, Target Canada elected to focus on the build-out of the physical stores and improving store operations, and did not prioritize the establishment of an online retail business for Canadian customers. This turned out to be a significant competitive disadvantage as the retail market moves beyond traditional bricks-and-mortar stores. By the time Target Canada woke up, it was too late.

This is reason number six leading to Target Canada closing.

7. Too little too late – Beginning in Spring 2014, Target Canada added internal resources and consulted at great length with a variety of strategic, operational and financial advisors in an attempt to improve Target Canada’s operations and identify strategies that could make the Canadian operations viable in the long term. Target Canada could not identify an option that would result in TCC breaking-even in the next five years. Were any of these financial viability studies conducted before the net spend of $1.6 billion on leases in 2011? Would not those same studies have identified what senior executives should have done to have a successful Target Canada launch?

This is reason number seven leading to Target Canada closing.

8. Not understanding the marketplace – In 2011, Canada had a population of 34.4 million. In comparison, this was slightly smaller than the population of the State of California at the same time. The financial returns for Canadian stores were expected to be in line with historical returns for U.S. store openings. This typically meant losses until the completion of the first full year of store operations, and profits thereafter. Target Canada never made any money. For the 2013 and 2014 fiscal periods, Target Canada’s losses totalled $3.6 billion (before interest and taxes).

This is reason number eight leading to Target Canada closing.

9. Management – Based on the above, clearly Target management miscalculated the success of an expansion into Canada out of the US. No doubt other US retailers who may be considering an expansion into Canada, must look at this expansion failure before embarking on implement their own expansion into Canada.

This is reason number nine leading to Target Canada closing.

At the time of filing, Target Canada had 17,600 employees. Because this is an orderly liquidation and not a restructuring and turnaround, those jobs will not be saved as a result of Target Canada closing. No doubt these job losses will create financial hardship for many of these employees’ families. To its credit, Target US has established a trust fund for payment of the Target Canada obligations to its employees. This trust fund is in addition to the proceeds from the sale of the Target Canada assets.

The lessons to be learned from the Target Canada closing story is that every business, regardless of size, must not only have a properly vetted business plan before implementing any business strategy, but management must have carefully studied and tested it to ensure as best as possible that management understands the marketplace it wishes to operate in and that the implementation of the plan will be successful for the business.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. acts for both debtors and secured lenders, in the performance of financial and viability assessments for financially challenged businesses. The earlier that we are consulted, the better the chances are that we can construct and assist management in implementing its plan to return to financial health without the need for receivership or bankruptcy proceedings.

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. before your business problems lead to your business closing. The earlier you begin to deal with debt, the more options you’ll have. We approach every file with the attitude that financial problems can be solved given immediate action and the right plan. Starting Over, Starting Now you can live a debt free life.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

Note: The facts contained herein regarding Target Canada Co. (“TCC”) and Target Corporation, and the expansion of Target Corporation into Canada was derived from the Affidavit of Mark J. Wong, General Counsel and Secretary of TCC, sworn January 14, 2015 in support of TCC’s CCAA application.

Call a Trustee Now!